Articles By All

Path: /college-football/history-big-east-conference-realignment

College football expansion has taken over the hearts and minds of college football junkies everywhere.

The sky is falling, rivalries are dead and the future of college football is in great peril. I am here to tell you that this just simply isn’t the case. Conference realignment has been taking place for more than a century and it won’t stop anytime soon. Teams have been switching leagues, conferences have been created out of thin air and college football has powered through all the criticism and into the playoff era.

So just in case you don’t remember the days of Georgia Tech winning SEC titles or Grinnell College's 10-year stint in the Big 8, Athlon is here to show you conference realignment isn’t a new phenomenon.

The History of Big East Conference Realignment
The History of SEC Realingment

The History of Big 12 Realignment

The Big East Conference Commissioners:

Dave Gavitt, 1979-1990
Mike Tranghese, 1990-2009
John Marinatto, 2009-2012
Joseph Bailey (interim), Present

The Big East Conference Timeline:

1979: The Big East Conference was originally a league designed as a basketball conglomerate. The northeast was, and still is, a hoops hotbed for talent, fans and NCAA championships. The league started with Boston College, UConn, Georgetown, Providence, St. John’s, Seton Hall and Syracuse as its members. Rutgers and Holy Cross were also invited to join but declined.

1980: Villanova accepted an invitation one year later.

1982: Pittsburgh was asked to join the Big East in its third year of existence. That same year, Penn State requested entrance to the league, but the league members voted against accepting the Nittany Lions. What do you think the Big East would look like today had PSU been allowed to join back in 1982? For the record, Penn State won two national championships in football: 1982 and 1986. The entire dynamic of this league’s existence can be traced back to that one decision made in 1982 when Penn State was denied admission.

1991: The Big East (finally) decides to embrace football and adds major football programs Miami, Rutgers, West Virginia, Virginia Tech and Temple to the group and takes part in its first Big East football season. One year earlier, Penn State had joined the Big Ten and two years later their athletics programs began Big Ten competition (1993).

1995: Notre Dame’s Olymipic sports join the Big East. Irish football remains Independent.

2001: The Miami Hurricanes win the Big East's first and only BCS-era National Championship with what many believe to be the best college team ever assembled. Miami would go on to lose in the BCS title game the following year and has yet to return to the championship game since.

2004: Miami and Virginia Tech begin the demise of the Big East as a football power conference by bolting for the ACC. Temple is also kicked out of the league as well.

2005: Boston College follows the Hurricanes and the Hokies to the ACC. To combat the major losses, Mike Tranghese counters by adding Cincinnati, Louisville, South Florida in all sports and DePaul and Marquette in all sports expect football.

2012: West Virginia, and what would have been TCU, both decide through a very public and ugly divorce to join the Big 12. The Big East scrambles to fill it’s schedule by re-inviting the Owls of Temple — who instantly accept the invitation for football only. TCU had previously accepted an invitation to join the Big East from the Mountain West but changed its mind when the Big 12 extended its own invitation to the Horned Frogs. TCU never played a game of any kind as a Big East institution.

2013: Houston, SMU, UCF, Memphis, Boise State and San Diego State are scheduled to join the league. Boise State and San Diego State are still waffling and may never play a game in the Big East. Fans of both the Big East and each school are still sitting on pins and needles about their respective futures. The rest of Temple’s athletic programs will also officially join the league as well.

2014: Unless legal recourse allows Pitt and Syracuse to leave earlier, the Panthers and Orange are slated to join the ACC in all sports. They would be the fourth and fifth former Big East members to join the ACC.

2015: Navy will become a football only member of the Big East.

Big East BCS Bowl History

Notes: Year is representative of the fall football season, not the actual date of the bowl
(#) = final national BCS ranking

1998 Orange: (8) Florida 31, (15) Syracuse 10
1999 Sugar (National Championship): (1) Florida State 46, (2) Virginia Tech 29
2000 Sugar: (3) Miami 37, (7) Florida 20
2001 Rose (National Championship): (1) Miami 37, (2) Nebraska 14
2002 Fiesta (National Championship): (2) Ohio State 31, (1) Miami 24 (2OT)
2003 Orange: (9) Miami 16, (7) Florida State 14
2004 Fiesta: (6) Utah 35, (21) Pitt 7
2005 Sugar: (11) West Virginia 38, (7) Georgia 35
2006 Orange: (6) Louisville 24, (14) Wake Forest 13
2007 Fiesta: (9) West Virginia 48, (4) Oklahoma 28
2008 Orange: (19) Virginia Tech 20, (12) Cincinnati 7
2009 Sugar: (5) Florida 51, (3) Cincinnati 24
2010 Fiesta: (7) Oklahoma 48, (UR) UConn 20
2011 Orange: (23) West Virginia 70, (15) Clemson 33

Overall Record: 7-7
National Championships: 1-2

The History of the Big East Conference:

Special thanks to for the above image. Please help keep Wikipedia free for all by donating here.

-by Braden Gall


More Conference Alignment and Playoff Content:

College Football Playoff: Did the BCS Really Get It Wrong?
Debate: What is the Biggest Unanswered Question Left In the College Football Playoff?

Debate: Did College Football Get It Right With A Four-Team Playoff?

Debate: How Should A Selection Committee Be Used?

<p> The History of Big East Conference Realignment</p>
Post date: Friday, June 29, 2012 - 06:00
Path: /college-football/college-football-history-sec-realignment

College football expansion has taken over the hearts and minds of college football junkies everywhere.

The sky is falling, rivalries are dead and the future of college football is in great peril. I am here to tell you that this just simply isn’t the case. Conference realignment has been taking place for more than a century and it won’t stop anytime soon. Teams have been switching leagues, conferences have been created out of thin air and college football has powered through all the criticism and into the playoff era.

So just in case you don’t remember the days of Georgia Tech winning SEC titles or Grinnell College's 10-year stint in the Big 8, Athlon is here to show you conference realignment isn’t a new phenomenon.

The History of Big East Conference Realignment
The History of SEC Realingment
The History of Big 12 Realignment

The SEC Commissioners:

Martin S. Conner, 1940-46
N.W. Dougherty (acting), 1947-48
Bernie Moore, 1948-66
A.M. “Tonto” Coleman, 1966-72
H. Boyd McWhorter, 1972-86
Harvey W. Schiller, 1986-89
Mark Womack (acting), 1988-89
Roy F. Kramer, 1990-2002
Mike Slive, 2002-Present

The SEC Timeline:

December 8, 1932: Thirteen universities located in and around the Southeastern United States decided to break from the Southern Conference to create the Southeastern Conference. At the time, the SoCon was a 23-team massive conglomerate that included major football powers like North Carolina, Clemson, Virginia, Maryland, South Carolina, Virginia Tech and NC State as well as the founding members of the SEC. The thirteen founding members of the SEC were Alabama, Auburn, Georgia, Georgia Tech, Florida, Kentucky, LSU, Ole Miss, Mississippi State, Sewanee, Tennessee, Tulane, and Vanderbilt.

1940: The University of the South, otherwise known as Sewanee, lost all 37 SEC games it played and the Tigers were shutout in 26 of those contests. Its overall SEC point differential was 1,163 to 84 in eight years of football. Interestingly enough, Sewanee will also change conferences this month when it leaves the D-III Southern Collegiate Athletic Conference to form the new D-III Southern Athletic Association.

1964: Georgia Tech departs from the SEC to become a founding member of the Metro Conference, a league that eventually became part of the modern Conference USA. In 1978, Tech became a founding member of the ACC. While in the SEC, the Yellow Jackets won five SEC championships (1939, 1943, 1944, 1951, 1952) and the 1952 National Championship. Tech has two more SEC titles than Kentucky, Mississippi State, Vanderbilt, Arkansas and South Carolina combined. Its next conference title wouldn’t come until 1990.

1966: Tulane decides to leave the SEC to become a member of the Metro Conference along with Georgia Tech. While the Yellow Jackets bounced for the greener pastures of the ACC when it was founded in the late '70s, the Green Wave eventually became a founding member of C-USA when the Metro and Great Midwest Conference merged in 1995. Tulane, too, has as many SEC titles (3) as Kentucky, Mississippi State, Vanderbilt, Arkansas and South Carolina combined.

1991: In an unprecedented move by conference commissioner Roy Kramer and the SEC, a football conference for the first time ever would play a conference championship game pitting the winner of two divisions in a neutral site showdown for supremacy. This, of course, came along with the addition of Arkansas and South Carolina to the league. Both the Razorbacks and Gamecocks instantly became the furthest outliers in the league. Geographically, Arkansas was the westernmost campus while Columbia was the easternmost. The Hogs have played in three SEC title games, losing by a combined score of 102-34. South Carolina took 19 years before it made it to its first SEC title game and it lost 56-17 to the eventual national champion Auburn Tigers in 2010.

1992: The first SEC title game occured following the 1992 season, when No. 2 Alabama defeated Florida and earned a trip to the Sugar Bowl to face an undefeated No. 1 Miami Hurricanes squad. The Crimson Tide crushed the heavily favored Canes, debunking the theory that the SEC would struggle to compete for national titles in its post-expansion two-division era.

2012: After a period of astronomical growth, and on the heels of Big Ten, Pac-12 and ACC expansion, Mike Slive carefully selected Texas A&M and Missouri to expand the SEC further into the Heartland. As of July 1, 2012, both institutions are fully functioning officially members of the SEC. Both combined for one Big 12 championship in the 16-year history of the league (Texas A&M, 1998)

SEC BCS Bowl History

Notes: Year is representative of the fall football season, not the actual date of the bowl
(#) = final national BCS ranking

1998 Fiesta (National Championship): (1) Tennessee 23, (2) Florida State 16
1998 Orange: (8) Florida 31, (15) Syracuse 10
1999 Fiesta: (3) Nebraska 31, (5) Tennessee 21
1999 Orange: (8) Michigan 35, (4) Alabama 34
2000 Sugar: (3) Miami 37, (7) Florida 20
2001 Sugar: (13) LSU 47, (8) Illinois 34
2001 Orange: (5) Florida 56, (10) Maryland 23
2002 Sugar: (3) Georgia 26, (14) Florida State 13
2003 Sugar (National Championship): (2) LSU 21, (1) Oklahoma 14
2004 Sugar: (3) Auburn 16, (8) Virginia Tech 13
2005 Sugar: (11) West Virginia 28, (7) Georgia 35
2006 Sugar: (4) LSU 41, (11) Notre Dame 14
2006 NCG: (2) Florida 41, (1) Ohio State 14
2007 Sugar: (5) Georgia 41, (10) Hawaii 10
2007 NCG: (2) LSU 38, (1) Ohio State 24
2008 Sugar: (6) Utah 31, (4) Alabama 17
2008 NCG: (2) Florida 24, (1) Oklahoma 14
2009 Sugar: (5) Florida 51, (3) Cincinnati 24
2009 NCG: (1) Alabama 37, (2) Texas 21
2010 Sugar: (6) Ohio State 31, (8) Arkansas 26
2010 NCG: (1) Auburn 22, (2) Oregon 19
2011 NCG: (2) Alabama 21, (1) LSU 0

Overall Record: 16-7
National Championships: 8-1

The History of the SEC:

Special thanks to for the above image. Please help keep Wikipedia free for all by donating here.

-by Braden Gall


More Conference Alignment and Playoff Content:

College Football Playoff: Did the BCS Really Get It Wrong?
Debate: What is the Biggest Unanswered Question Left In the College Football Playoff?

Debate: Did College Football Get It Right With A Four-Team Playoff?

Debate: How Should A Selection Committee Be Used?

<p> The History of SEC Realignment</p>
Post date: Friday, June 29, 2012 - 06:00
Path: /college-football/college-football-history-big-12-realignment

College football expansion has taken over the hearts and minds of college football junkies everywhere.

The sky is falling, rivalries are dead and the future of college football is in great peril. I am here to tell you that this just simply isn’t the case. Conference realignment has been taking place for more than a century and it won’t stop anytime soon. Teams have been switching leagues, conferences have been created out of thin air and college football has powered through all the criticism and into the playoff era.

So just in case you don’t remember the days of Georgia Tech winning SEC titles or Grinnell College's one-year stint in the Big 8, Athlon is here to show you conference realignment isn’t a new phenomenon.

The History of Big East Conference Realignment
The History of SEC Realingment
The History of Big 12 Realignment

The Big 12 Conference Commissioners:

Charles Martin Dobbs, 1994-15 (development)
Steven J. Hatchell, 1995-98
Dave Martin (interim), 1998
Kevin Weiberg, 1998-2007
Dan Beebe, 2007-11
Chuck Neinas, 2011-12
Bob Bowlsby, Present

The Big 12 Conference Timeline:

In order to track the development and creation of the Big 12, one must understand how it was birthed in 1996. The best of the Southwest Conference (SWC) and Big 8 were essentially combined into the Big 12. That is where the story begins (try to keep up):

1907: The Big 8 is originally created using the name Missouri Valley Intercollegiate Athletic Association (MVIAA). The founding members were Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, Washington-St. Louis and Iowa.

1908: Iowa State and Drake were both added to the MVIAA.

1911: Iowa departed as it had been a joint member of both the Big Ten and MVIAA.

1913: Kansas State is invited and accepts an invitation to the MVIAA.

1915: The Southwest Conference is founded by Arkansas, Baylor, Oklahoma, Oklahoma A&M, Texas, Texas A&M, Rice and Southwestern.

1916: Southwestern drops out of the SWC after only one year.

1918: Nebraska departs the MVIAA and plays two seasons as an independent. Meanwhile, SMU joins the SWC.

1919: Oklahoma and Saint Louis University both apply for membership in the league but are denied admission “due to deficient management of their athletic programs.” Instead, Grinnell College is used to replace the Cornhuskers.

1920: After one year, the MVIAA decides that maybe Oklahoma is a good fit and allows the Sooners to join the conference, leaving the Southwest Conference behind. Phillips University decides to join the Southwestern Conference — which lasted only one year.

1921: Nebraska comes back to the league after a two-year hiatus.

1923: TCU joins the SWC.

1925: Oklahoma State, then called Oklahoma A&M, switches from the SWC to the MVIAA

1928: A pivotal break amongst the bigger and smaller schools leads to the origins of the Big 8. Oklahoma, Kansas, Nebraska, Missouri, Kansas State and Iowa State depart the MVIAA to form what was then commonly referred to as the Big 6 Conference. Meanwhile, Drake, Grinnell, Oklahoma A&M and Washington (STL) left to form the Missouri Valley Conference (MVC).

1947: After 20 years of relative stability (and arguing with the MVC), Colorado is added to the Big 6 Conference — which informally becomes the Big 7 Conference.

1957: Oklahoma A&M, now named the more recognizable Oklahoma State, rejoins its larger brethren and the MVIAA becomes known as the Big Eight.

1958: Texas Technological College, better know today as Texas Tech University, officially starts competing in SWC athletics having been admitted to the league two years earlier.

1964: The Missouri Valley Intercollegiate Athletic Association officially changes its name to the Big Eight Confernece. Four years later it will enter into an agreement with the Orange Bowl.

1976: The Houston Couagars football team, having being admitted to the league in 1971, begins competition in the Southwestern Conference. It wins the SWC championship in its first year.

1991: Arkansas leaves for the SEC after seeing the writing on the wall concerning the creation of a Texas-centered power conference in which the Razorbacks might have been left out (a la TCU, SMU, Houston, Rice, etc).

1996: The Big 12 is formed when the best of the SWC (Texas, Texas A&M, Texas Tech, Baylor) and is joined with the Big 8. The nation’s second power conference championship game is formed four years after the SEC’s experiment was a huge success.

2011: Nebraska leaves for the Big Ten while Colorado leaves for the Pac-12 as all parties in the Big 12 (minus Texas and Oklahoma) are upset with the revenue sharing model.

2012: Missouri and Texas A&M leave for the SEC while TCU and West Virginia leave the Big East for the Big 12.

Big 12 Conference BCS Bowl History

Notes: Year is representative of the fall football season, not the actual date of the bowl
(#) = final national BCS ranking

1998 Sugar: (4) Ohio State 24, (6) Texas A&M 14
1999 Fiesta: (3) Nebraska 31, (5) Tennessee 21
2000 Orange (NCG): (1) Oklahoma 13, (2) Florida State 2
2001 Fiesta: (4) Oregon 38, (3) Colorado 16
2001 Rose (NCG): (1) Miami 37, (2) Nebraska 14
2002 Rose: (7) Oklahoma 34, (6) Washington State 14
2003 Sugar (NCG): (2) LSU 21, (1) Oklahoma 14
2003 Fiesta: (5) Ohio State 35, (10) Kansas State 28
2004 Orange (NCG): (1) USC 55, (2) Oklahoma 19
2004 Rose: (4) Texas 38, (13) Michigan 37
2005 Rose (NCG): (2) Texas 41, (1) USC 38
2006 Fiesta: (8) Boise State 43, (10) Oklahoma 42 (OT)
2007 Fiesta: (9) West Virginia 48, (4) Oklahoma 28
2007 Orange: (8) Kansas 24, (3) Virginia Tech 21
2008 Fiesta: (3) Texas 24, (10) Ohio State 21
2008 NCG: (2) Florida 24, (1) Oklahoma 14
2009 NCG: (1) Alabama 37, (2) Texas 21
2010 Fiesta: (7) Oklahoma 48, (UR) UConn 20
2011 Fiesta: (3) Oklahoma State 41, (4) Stanford 38 (OT)

Overall Record: 9-10
National Championships: 2-5

-by Braden Gall


More Conference Alignment and Playoff Content:

College Football Playoff: Did the BCS Really Get It Wrong?
Debate: What is the Biggest Unanswered Question Left In the College Football Playoff?

Debate: Did College Football Get It Right With A Four-Team Playoff?

Debate: How Should A Selection Committee Be Used?

<p> College Football: The History of Big 12 Realignment</p>
Post date: Friday, June 29, 2012 - 06:00
Path: /college-football/whats-next-college-football-realignment

College football realignment has dominated the headlines throughout parts of the last two years. The biggest move before last season's moving day was Nebraska's decision to leave the Big 12 for the Big Ten. On July 1, 2012, it will be a busy moving day across college football, as West Virginia and TCU will join the Big 12 and Missouri and Texas A&M become members of the SEC.

Although realignment may take a back seat for a couple of months, there's no question it will jump back in the headlines in the next few years. 

What’s Next in College Football Realignment?

1. Waiting on the Big 12: 10, 12 or 14? That’s the million-dollar question facing new Big 12 commissioner Bob Bowlsby. Will the Big 12 expand to 12 or 14 teams? Or will it stand pat at 10? Florida State and Clemson have been rumored as possible candidates to leave the ACC for the Big 12, but the No. 1 target is clearly Notre Dame. The Big 12 seems content with 10 teams, but a lot could change in the next couple of years. In addition to Florida State, Clemson and Notre Dame, Louisville is also believed to be on the radar for Big 12 expansion. Although it’s not a necessity, the Big 12 should add another team or two to bridge the geographic gap to West Virginia. It may not happen in 2012 or 2013, but expect the Big 12 to explore expansion once again in the near future.

2. The Big East: Much has changed in the Big East over the last year. Pittsburgh and Syracuse decided to bolt the conference for the ACC, while West Virginia sued to leave for the Big 12 in 2012. The departures left the Big East with only five football members for 2013, and the conference restocked by adding Houston, SMU, Memphis, San Diego State, Boise State and UCF. Navy will join the Big East in 2015, and Temple was able to join for 2012, which keeps the conference at eight football members. While the Big East has some stability with these additions, it could be short lived. Boise State is struggling to find a home for its non-football sports and could be forced to return to the Mountain West. Also, the Broncos’ quest to find a home for its non-football sports will also have an impact on San Diego State’s conference alignment for 2013. Even if Boise State and the Aztecs join the Big East, the conference could be under siege once again in the coming years, especially if the ACC decides to expand to 16 teams. Some have already dismissed the Big East as a power conference, but getting Boise State to join and keeping Louisville in the mix will be crucial to its long-term success.

3. ACC Stability?: Rumors about Florida State and Clemson’s future with the ACC persisted throughout this offseason. The Big 12 has commented it is not interested in expanding, but that could change quickly. The ACC added Pittsburgh and Syracuse, giving the conference 14 teams in 2013. The Panthers and Orange won’t add much in terms of football value, but will help the ACC on the hardwood. The ACC may look to expand to 16 teams in the future, with Connecticut and Rutgers frequently mentioned as possible targets. Although Florida State and Clemson have underachieved at times, keeping these two programs in the mix is a must for the ACC. All signs point to both teams staying, but as we have seen with conference realignment, things can change in a hurry.

4. Impact of a Playoff: Could the news of the four-team playoff have an impact on conference realignment? The initial feeling is that the new postseason format won’t ignite a new round of changes. However, who knows what will happen after a couple of years in the new system. Adding more teams to a conference decreases the money for each member, and there has to be a concern about making the road too difficult to reach a national title game. This is one area that can’t be evaluated now, but is worth monitoring over the next five years.

5. Super conferences: Much has been made about super conferences and the future of college football. Could we see a 16-team league in the next few years? It’s certainly possible. However, let’s consider the Pac-12 and Big Ten. Are there really four new members that fit each conference? At this point, both leagues would be adding teams just for the sake of getting to 16 teams. The SEC doesn’t seem to be overly interested in expanding, but could look to add teams in the North Carolina or Virginia markets. Is that anytime soon? Probably not. Maybe the ACC or Big East will expand to 16 teams, but the talk of super conferences seems to be overblown.

Related College Football Realignment Content

College Football Realignment Winners and Losers
A History of Realignment in the Big 12 Conference
A History of Realignment in the SEC
A History of Realignment in the Big East

College Basketball Realignment Winners and Losers
Redrafting College Football's Conferences
Will Notre Dame Ever Join a Conference?
Was Independence a Mistake for BYU?
Introducing West Virginia to the Big 12
SEC Football: Getting to Know Missouri
SEC Football: Getting to Know Texas A&M
TCU Football Comes Home to the Big 12

<p> What's next in college football realignment?</p>
Post date: Friday, June 29, 2012 - 05:29
Path: /college-football/notre-dame-football-will-irish-ever-join-conference

Notre Dame remains committed to Independence, but will that ever change? The BCS will be eliminated when a four-team playoff begins in 2014 and more realignment could happen in several BCS conferences. The Irish are the main target of expansion for the Big 12, ACC and Big Ten, but they do not appear interested in joining a conference - at least for now.

Will Notre Dame Football Ever Join a Conference?

David Fox (@DavidFox615)
If college football is going to have a playoff, Notre Dame could certainly give up on independence. To be clear, it’s not going to happen immediately and it may end up being a matter of last resort. If the new playoff format diminishes Notre Dame’s ability to compete, I could see the Irish joining a league -- and of course, they would have no shortage of suitors. For now, Notre Dame still has the clout to be a part of the decision-making process of the playoff even if the Irish haven’t finished in the top four since 1993. At some point, especially if Notre Dame struggles to get over the eight-win mark, Notre Dame may need to move into a conference simply to recruiting -- meaning the Irish may look outside of Big Ten territory in order to gain a foothold in Texas or the South. I would never say Notre Dame will always remain independent, but something seismic, be it more realignment, a conference-champion only playoff system or more losing seasons, to force the hands of the Irish.

Braden Gall (@BradenGall)
Swirling rumors right now are that Notre Dame will switch all of its Olympic sports to the Big 12 — a monumental move that means very little to the immediate layout of college football but will have far-reaching, long-term effects. It sets up Fighting Irish football for a potential move into a stable, lucrative power conference when it does finally need to join a league. This won't take place for years, maybe even decades, but eventually the Golden Domers will need to join a power conference for football and the Big 12 is a much more attractive option than the Big East. Notre Dame football will join a league at some point down the road or it will be left out of the big playoff pie that is coming down the pike. But it looks like the back-from-the-ashes Big 12 is the likely destination, not the Big East or Big Ten.

Steven Lassan (@AthlonSteven)
In the next 5-10 years? No. At some point? Yes. I know Notre Dame values its Independence, but college football will change. A four-team playoff may morph into an 8 or 16-team tournament and there may be more of an incentive to join a conference. New presidents, athletic directors and other leaders in 25 years may feel differently about Independence. Also, if more leagues decide to go to nine conference games, scheduling could get more difficult. The ACC, Big Ten and Big 12 have all been rumored as possible landing spots if Notre Dame wants to join a conference, and there’s no question the Irish are the biggest domino waiting to fall. The rumors will persist about Notre Dame joining a conference, but I think it will be a while before the Irish agree to give up Independence.  

Mitch Light (@AthlonMitch)
Ever is a strong word, but my guess is that Notre Dame will not join a conference in the next 10 years. With no barrier to entry into a four-team playoff, there really is no incentive for Notre Dame to join a league at this point. The Fighting Irish consistently play a schedule that is strong enough to warrant a bid into the postseason — assuming of course that they win enough games — so why would a school that has taken so much pride in its status as an Independent decide at this point to join a conference? It just doesn’t make sense. 

Mark Ross
I think Notre Dame will eventually join a conference, but when it does, it will definitely be on its terms. Notre Dame has been an independent since 1978 and while the Fighting Irish may not be the dominant football power they once were, they have been able to maintain their status as one. Look no further than the school's presence in the BCS.

Still, with the way the college football landscape has changed during the past few years and the fact that it will continue to evolve in the future, I believe the day will come when Notre Dame sees its in their best interests football-wise to join one of the so-called super conferences. Given its history, tradition and status, there's little doubt in my mind that any conference looking to make a statement or solidify its standing wouldn't give Notre Dame a serious look and/or roll out the red carpet for the Fighting Irish to come join them.

Not many schools can say they control their own fate when it comes to this game of conference musical chairs. But as the past 34 years have shown us, Notre Dame is in a class of its own when it comes to the college football landscape. 

Related College Football Content

Athlon's 2012 Top 25 Rankings: No. 20 Notre Dame
College Football Countdown to Kickoff

Notre Dame's Top 10 Players for 2012

Athlon's 2012 College Football Rankings

College Football's Top 25 Heisman Contenders for 2012

<p> Will Notre Dame Ever Join a Conference?</p>
Post date: Friday, June 29, 2012 - 05:05
Path: /college-football/byu-football-independence-mistake-cougars

BYU is coming off a solid 10-3 season in its first year as an Independent. The Cougars played a soft schedule in the second half of 2011, which helped the team to rebound after a 1-2 start. Although BYU is a solid program, choosing the Independence route over a conference is an interesting debate for the next 15-20 years. 

Is Independence a Mistake for BYU?

David Fox (@DavidFox615)
Few schools could leave a conference -- particularly a non-power conference -- and improve their standing. BYU did. BYU’s recruiting base of Mormon athletes and/or athletes seeking the honor code is going to be attracted to Provo no matter the league. If anything, independence helps BYU’s recruiting cause by giving the Cougars a unique cachet. Utah goes to the Pac-12, BYU is independent. At least compared to its chief rival, BYU won't have to battle the perception problem of being in an inferior league. The Cougars will have trouble scheduling, but they’ll have their share of marquee games, too. BYU has played Florida State and Oklahoma, it has a series with Notre Dame and Texas, not to mention a handful of games against Pac-12 opponents. Moreover, BYU has more national exposure than it ever did as a team in the Mountain West. BYU was on an ESPN network just five times from 2006 to 2010. In one season as an independent, BYU was on an ESPN network 10 times. Will this be a long-term solution for BYU? Probably not. BYU eventually will end up wherever it can best compete for a national title. I assume that will be a conference. But for now, the Big 12 and Pac-12 aren’t interested. At least as an independent, BYU doesn’t have to deal with the revolving door of Mountain West membership.

Braden Gall (@BradenGall)
My instincts tell me that long-term Independence for BYU is a major mistake. The Cougars are a unique brand that plays nationally, attracts a very specific audience and will be just fine in the short-term. But Mark Emmert has openly spoken about his concerns about the growing gap between the "haves" and the "have-nots" in college football. And to be one of those "haves," BYU will need to be in a power conference. Aside from not getting huge conference-based TV payouts each year, scheduling might be the most obvious issue. Finding good games in the early months won't be an issue, but getting quality opponents to come to Provo in late October and November will be virtually impossible. So if the Cougars are consistently playing Fresno State, Wyoming and New Mexico in the second half of the season, they will likely never land in the Top 4 at the end of the year. Which, in case you missed it, is the only thing any football office in America cares about now.

Steven Lassan (@AthlonSteven)
For now, I think this is the right move for BYU. The Cougars are able to schedule nationally and have upgraded television exposure with an ESPN contract. I do have doubts about this decision as a long-term move. Scheduling will be more difficult if conferences continue to go to nine league games. A weak schedule also won’t help BYU’s hopes of getting into the four-team playoff or access into one of the premier bowls.

I’ve always thought the move to Independence was a short-term decision as the program bides time until the next round of realignment hits college football. The Big 12 and Big East have been mentioned as possible landing spots, but the Cougars can take some time and pick their next home. It may take 10-20 years, but I expect BYU will join a conference again – whether it’s the Big East, Big 12 or a new league on the west coast with Boise State and the Cougars as the anchors. 

Mitch Light (@AthlonMitch)
It depends what other legitimate options the school had at the time it made the move. I think being an Independent, for BYU, is favorable to being the Mountain West (as it is now constructed), but I believe the Big 12 would be a better solution than being an Independent. For BYU, and really for every school in the nation, it comes down to the following in the new landscape of college football: Is your schedule good enough to get you invited to the new four-team playoff. Right now, it’s debatable whether BYU’s 2012 schedule would be strong enough to put the Cougars in position to be a Final Four team (can we call it that?) even if it runs the table. There would be no worries if BYU was in the Big 12; the schedule in that league will always be strong enough to warrant inclusion in the postseason.

Mark Ross
As far as the here and now goes, I don't think BYU made a mistake by going independent in football. With a four-team playoff going into effect in 2014, the Cougars' independent status doesn't impact their chances of getting into the playoff any more than it would if they were still in the Mountain West or another mid-major conference. So as it stands right now, BYU has total control over its schedule, and, more importantly, doesn't have to share any of the revenue generated from its TV deal with ESPN. After all, this sort of arrangement has worked pretty well for Notre Dame and NBC, right?

Also, BYU's independent status should put them in prime position to capitalize on the next wave of conference expansion, if it chooses to do so. Chances are the move to a four-team playoff will do little, if anything, to put an end to the evolving landscape that college football conferences have become. If this movement continues and say the Pac-12 or Big 12 gets serious about adding more teams, then BYU should be one of the first schools to get a call. Should that happen, BYU doesn't have to worry about breaking its contract with any conference as it pertains to football, making any such transition basically seamless. The Cougars' other sports are participating in the West Coast Conference, but if we've learned anything during this latest wave of conference realignment and expansion it's that football is the straw that stirs the drink.

In the end, I would rather be wanted by someone than feeling like I have to make a move just for the sake of making one or because of other circumstances. The former is the position I see BYU in, meaning the school is in the driver's seat the next time the opportunity presents itself to find the Cougars a new home.

Related College Football Content

2012 College Football Rankings: No. 39 BYU
BYU Cougars 2012 Team Preview

Redrafting College Football's Conferences
College Football Realignment Winners and Losers

<p> Is Independence a Mistake for BYU?</p>
Post date: Friday, June 29, 2012 - 04:17
All taxonomy terms: College Football, Georgia Bulldogs, SEC, News
Path: /college-football/georgia-football-isaiah-crowells-future-doubt-after-arrest

Georgia running back Isaiah Crowell’s future with the team is in doubt after an arrest early Friday morning on three weapons charges. The sophomore-to-be was arrested on charges of possessing a weapon in a school zone (a felony) and carrying a concealed weapon (a misdemeanor). The weapon Crowell had in possession had an altered identification mark, which is another felony. He was booked into Athens-Clarke County Jail, with bond set at $7,500.

As a result of his arrest and three charges, Crowell is facing an immediate suspension. Head coach Mark Richt has yet to issue a statement regarding the running back’s arrest.

Crowell’s incident isn’t the first bit of offseason trouble for Georgia. Cornerback Branden Smith was arrested on marijuana drug charges in March, while fellow corner Sanders Commings pled guilty to charges of battery and disorderly conduct. Commings is expected to miss the first two games of 2012.

In addition to the issues at cornerback, linebacker Alec Ogletree and safety Bacarri Rambo are facing suspensions for violating team rules.

Crowell came to Georgia ranked as one of the top running backs in the 2011 recruiting class. He played in 12 games as a true freshman, rushing for 850 yards and five touchdowns. Although Crowell had a solid debut, he was suspended one game for a failed drug test and dealt with injuries throughout the second half of last year.

Considering Crowell’s inability to stay on the field last year, Georgia has experience using other running backs and wasn’t counting on him to carry the entire workload this year. Richard Samuel is moving to fullback in 2012, but rushed for 240 yards and one touchdown on 82 attempts in 2011. Ken Malcome closed out last season by rushing for at least 37 yards in each of the last four games. He recorded a season best 51 yards in the Outback Bowl loss to Michigan State.

Will Georgia’s SEC Title Hopes Suffer Without Crowell?

Crowell was a top talent, but Georgia’s SEC East title hopes remain intact. And frankly, losing Crowell isn’t a huge blow to the team. The Bulldogs return quarterback Aaron Murray, along with 10 starts on defense. The schedule is very favorable, as Georgia misses Alabama, Arkansas and LSU in crossover games with the West.

While Crowell’s playing career in Athens could be finished, the Bulldogs won’t miss a beat on the ground.

Coach Mark Richt recruited two highly-rated backs, with Keith Marshall ranking as the No. 15 overall prospect in the 2012 Athlon Consensus 100, while Todd Gurley checked in as the No. 11 running back in the nation.

Marshall checks in at 5-foot-11 and 190 pounds, while Gurley is a bigger option at 6-foot-1 and 195 pounds. Both backs have good speed and can contribute right away in 2012.

In addition to Marshall and Gurley’s arrival, Georgia has other potential contributors in Samuel and Malcome. Although neither player possesses the gamebreaking ability of the freshmen, both are expected to figure into the workload.  

The Bulldogs are the early favorites to win the SEC East in 2012, but it won't be easy to hold off South Carolina once again. The Gamecocks have some key losses on both sides of the ball, and running back Marcus Lattimore is returning from a torn ACL. However, quarterback Connor Shaw played well in the second half of 2011, and the defensive line is one of the best in college football.

Georgia’s biggest question mark is its offensive line, which loses center Ben Jones and tackles Cordy Glenn and Justin Anderson.

Considering this isn’t Georgia’s first incident this offseason, Crowell’s arrest should be a big deal for Richt. Although Crowell has five-star talent, Richt has to wonder if it’s really worth the trouble to keep him around.

Whether or not Crowell is on the team in 2012, it shouldn’t have a major impact on Georgia’s 2012 SEC and National Title hopes.  

Related Georgia Content

Georgia Bulldogs 2012 Team Preview
2012 SEC Predictions

Athlon's 2012 All-SEC Team

<p> Georgia Football: Isaiah Crowell's Future Doubt After Arrest</p>
Post date: Friday, June 29, 2012 - 02:45
All taxonomy terms: College Football, Fantasy, News
Path: /college-football/college-fantasy-football-examining-best-players-big-east

College fantasy football drafts will be heating up over the next few months and Athlon Sports has teamed with The College Fantasy Football Site to provide in-depth coverage for 2012. 

Here's a look at the best of the best for the Big East in terms of fantasy options for 2012:

2012 Preseason Big East All-Fantasy Team

Using a starting roster of 2-QB, 3-RB, 3-WR, FLEX, TE, K, Def/ST, All-Conference Fantasy Teams are projected using the following scoring system:

Passing—25 pass yds = 1 point, Passing TD = 4 points, INTs = -1 point

Rushing—10 rushing yards = 1 point, Rushing TDs = 6 points

Receiving—.5 points per reception, 10 receiving yards = 1 point, Receiving TDs = 6 points

Kicking—Extra Point = 1 point, FG 0-39 yards = 3 points, 40-49 yards = 4 points, 50+ = 5 points

Defense/ST—Defense, KR, and PR TDs = 6 points, Safety = 2 points, Fumbles and INTs = 3 points, Sack = 1 point, Points allowed (0 = 15 points, 2-6 = 10 points, 7-10 = 7 points, 11-13 = 5 points, 14-21 = 4 points, 22-28 = 2 points, 29-24 = 0 points, 35+ = -2 points)



QB—B.J. Daniels, Sr. (South Florida)

Last season:  Passed for 2,585 yards and 13 TDs, rushed for 601 yards and 6 TDs.

Best 3-game stretch of 2012:  Weeks 1-2-3; Chattanooga, @ Nevada, Rutgers

Playoff Weeks (11-12-13):  Bye, @ Miami, @ Cincinnati


QB—Chris Coyer, Jr. (Temple)

Last season:  Passed for 463 yards and 6 TDs, rushed for 562 yards and 3 TDs.

Best 3-game stretch of 2012:  Weeks 11-12-13; Cincinnati, @ Army, Syracuse

Playoff Weeks (11-12-13):  Cincinnati, @ Army, Syracuse


RB—Lyle McCombs, So. (Connecticut)

Last season:  Rushed for 1,151 yards and 7 TDs, 19 receptions for 172 yards and TD.

Best 3-game stretch of 2012:  Weeks 3-4-5; @ Maryland, @ W. Michigan, Buffalo

Playoff Weeks (11-12-13):  Pitt, Bye, @ Louisville


RB—Ray Graham, Sr. (Pitt)

Last season:  Rushed for 958 yards and 9 TDs, 30 receptions for 200 yards, missed five games (knee).

Best 3-game stretch of 2012:  Weeks 8-9-10; @ Buffalo, Temple, @ Notre Dame

Playoff Weeks (11-12-13):  @ UConn, Bye, Rutgers


RB—Matt Brown, Sr. (Temple)

Last season:  Rushed for 916 yards and 6 TDs as primary backup to Bernard Pierce.

Best 3-game stretch of 2012:  Weeks 1-2-3-4; Villanova, Maryland, Bye, @ Penn St

Playoff Weeks (11-12-13):  Cincinnati, @ Army, Syracuse


WR—Alec Lemon, Sr. (Syracuse)

Last season:  Led the team with 68 receptions for 834 yards and 6 TDs.

Best 3-game stretch of 2012:  Weeks 3-4-5-6; Stony Brook, @ Minnesota, Bye, Pitt

Playoff Weeks (11-12-13):  Louisville, @ Missouri, @ Temple


WR—Brandon Coleman, So. (Rutgers)

Last season:  17 receptions for 552 yards and 6 TDs.

Best 3-game stretch of 2012:  Weeks 8-9-10-11; @ Temple, Kent St, Bye, Army

Playoff Weeks (11-12-13):  Army, @ Cincinnati, @ Pitt


WR—Anthony McClung, Jr. (Cincinnati)

Last season:  Led the team with 49 receptions for 683 yards and 6 TDs.

Best 3-game stretch of 2012:  Weeks 6-7-8; Miami (OH), Fordham, @ Toledo

Playoff Weeks (11-12-13):  @ Temple, Rutgers, S. Florida


TE—Ryan Griffin, Sr. (Connecticut)

Last season:  33 receptions for 499 yards and 3 TDs.

Best 3-game stretch of 2012:  Weeks 1-2-3; UMass, NC St, @ Maryland

Playoff Weeks (11-12-13):  Pitt, Bye, @ Louisville


FLEX—Demetris Murray, Sr. (South Florida)

Last season:  Rushed for 503 yards and 8 TDs, 18 receptions for 205 yards.

Best 3-game stretch of 2012:  Weeks 1-2-3; Chattanooga, @ Nevada, Rutgers

Playoff Weeks (11-12-13):  Bye, @ Miami, @ Cincinnati


K—Maikon Bonani, Sr. (South Florida)

Last season: 15-for-17 on FG attempts, 50-for-50 on extra points.

Best 3-game stretch of 2012:  Weeks 1-2-3; Chattanooga, @ Nevada, Rutgers

Playoff Weeks (11-12-13):  Bye, @ Miami, @ Cincinnati


DEF/ST—Rutgers Scarlet Knights

Last season:  No. 8 scoring defense, No. 9 passing defense, No. 14 total defense.

Best 3-game stretch of 2012:  Weeks 8-9-10-11; @ Temple, Kent St, Bye, Army

Playoff Weeks (11-12-13):  Army, @ Cincinnati, @ Pitt


Top 5 Reserves

QB—Teddy Bridgewater, So. (Louisville)

RB—Jawan Jamison, So. (Rutgers)

RB—George Winn, Sr. (Cincinnati)

WR—DeVante Parker, So. (Louisville)

WR—Devin Street, Jr. (Pitt)



By Joe DiSalvo

The College Fantasy Football Site



Follow Joe DiSalvo on twitter (@theCFFsite)

Related Content: Athlon's 2012 College Fantasy Football Rankings

<p> College Fantasy Football: Examining the Best Players in the Big East</p>
Post date: Friday, June 29, 2012 - 02:07
All taxonomy terms: College Football, News
Path: /college-football/college-football-conference-realignment-draft-final-word

Now that our four commissioners have drafted their 16-team conferences, it’s up to the leadership to fit all the pieces together.

Through our draft, strategies emerged for how each commissioner approached tradition, rivalries and geography.

Explaining every pick: Rounds 1-4 | Rounds 5-8 | Rounds 9-12 | Rounds 13-16

Will each conference have championship games? A mini-playoff? What about divisions? How many conference games will each team play?

Our four commissioners explain their philosophy in picking teams for their leagues and how each elected to format their 16-team conferences:

Commissioner: Mitch Light, managing editor (@AthlonMitch)

My approach for the most part was to grab the best programs available with each pick (though I tried to secure some rivalries late in the draft). Clearly, however, I didn’t pay enough attention to geography. Arizona State is an obvious misfit — it’s the only program west of Texas — and I would have preferred to have a bigger presence in Texas and the Deep South.

For football, I’ve divided my league into four four-team divisions:

Continental Division Midwest Division
Illinois Indiana
Kansas State Michigan State
Miami Penn State
Vanderbilt Purdue
West Division South Division
Arkansas Duke
Arizona State Georgia
Oklahoma NC State
Texas Virginia Tech

I favor an eight-game league schedule, but that’s not practical in a 16-team league, so we will go with nine conference games. Each team will play the other three teams in its division every season and play two teams from the three other divisions on a rotating basis.

This might not be popular with all of the coaches in the league, but we will have a four-team playoff to determine the conference championship. The four division winners will meet in the semifinals, with the higher seeded teams serving as the host. The two winners will meet the following week on a neutral site.

The winner of the league title could go on to play 16 games, if it reached the national championship game in the new four-team playoff. That seems like a lot — and it is — but keep in mind that North Dakota State and Sam Houston State, the two finalists in the FCS title game, played 15 games last year.

For basketball, the league will also be divided into four four-team divisions. Two eight-team divisions makes a little more sense, but scheduling becomes problematic. There’s no way to play every team in your division twice (home and home) and play each team in the other division once unless you want a 22-game league schedule. And that is not happening. So we will stick with the four divisions. Each team will play the other three teams in its division twice and play each team in the other three divisions once for an 18-game schedule.

Commissioner: Braden Gall, editor (@BradenGall)

I had a distinct strategy heading into this draft. I wanted to attack the two most powerful and lucrative areas of the country: the Southeast because of the dedication to athletics and the Midwest, where, like it or not, there are still more eyes, ears and TV revenue than anywhere else in the nation. So my first four picks solidified these two areas and I did so with some of the country's most powerful brands in Notre Dame, Alabama and Nebraska. I wanted to completely avoid the Mountain and West Coast regions specifically due to dedication — fan, administrative, etc. There are great programs and fan bases out West, but not like the Southeast, Midwest and Heartland.

The other three areas I wanted to expand to were the Eastern Seaboard and the states of Texas and Florida. With South Florida, North Carolina and Maryland, I have a presence up and down the entire coast — including one program in the heart of the Sunshine State. With three schools in Texas, my league will be playing upwards of 15 games per year within the most talent-rich state in the country. I had the Lone Star State targeted in the final four rounds of my draft and I felt like I landed plenty of upside with Houston, TCU and Texas Tech.

North Division East Division
Louisville Maryland
Missouri North Carolina
Nebraska South Florida
Notre Dame Tennessee
South Division West Division
Alabama Houston
Auburn LSU
Ole Miss TCU
Mississippi State Texas Tech

With a four division "pod" model of alignment, I created some regional and divisional rivalries. Obviously, maintaining complete control of the Iron Bowl and the Egg Bowl was crucial. My league will play nine conference games every year using a 3-2-2-2 model. Every team will play three division games each year and then two alternating teams from each of the other three divisions. This ensures that, even in a 16-team league, that every teams will play every other school in the league every two years. Basketball and baseball will operate without any divisions and scheduling will rotate.

The biggest anomaly within my league will be my championship format. The division winners will be seeded 1-4 based on record (with head-to-head then overall record used as tie-breakers) in a two-week playoff format. Yes, it adds one extra football game for two teams in my league. But guess what, that means extra revenue for my conference. Roy Kramer was completed hammered in the media when he created the "SEC Championship Game" and I am pretty sure that worked out just fine. I am simply taking the next step.

Finally, my revenue allocation model will follow the Big Ten's plan of perfectly even distribution of wealth throughout the league. It is the only reasonable way to operate.

Commissioner: Steven Lassan, deputy online editor (@AthlonSteven)

This was one of the most unique drafts I’ve participated in, so it was hard to pinpoint a strategy before pick No. 1. Initially, I planned on building four divisions of four teams from various parts of the nation, and that plan was on track early with the selections of Florida, Florida State, USC and UCLA. However, my plan was changed midway through the draft as I settled on two eight-team divisions:

East Division West Division
Clemson Baylor
Connecticut California
Florida Colorado
Florida State Kansas
Georgia Tech Oklahoma State
South Carolina Texas A&M
Syracuse USC
Virginia UCLA

My East Division will be anchored by Florida and Florida State, while South Carolina and Clemson head up the next tier. The East isn’t a strong top-to-bottom football league, but could get better if Syracuse returns to its 1990s level. Virginia and Georgia Tech are solid overall athletic programs and good academic institutions.

The West Division stretches from Texas to California and includes rising programs like Oklahoma State and Baylor. I’m leaning on USC to navigate NCAA sanctions without much trouble, while Texas A&M and UCLA need to pickup their football performance. Kansas doesn’t add much in football, but it will help the basketball product in this division.

I missed out on getting any schools from the upper Midwest (Big Ten country), which wasn’t by design. I wanted to grab at least one from that region, but none fell to me in the draft.

Football schedules will feature seven contests within the division and two crossover games. I plan on staging a conference title game at Cowboys Stadium in Arlington, Texas.

I went into the draft planning on building a football-centric league, but I ended up with some solid basketball programs. Kansas, Florida, Connecticut and Syracuse all have titles in the 2000s, while Florida State has emerged as an ACC title contender under Leonard Hamilton.

My plan for basketball leagues is four four-team divisions with an 18-game conference slate. Each team will play its three divisional opponents two times and match up against the other 12 teams once each year.

Midwest Division East Division
Baylor Connecticut
Kansas South Carolina
Oklahoma State Syracuse
Texas A&M Virginia
West Southeast
California Clemson
Colorado Florida
USC Florida State
UCLA Georgia Tech

It’s a bit of a strange fit for South Carolina to be in a division with Connecticut, Syracuse and Virginia, but there’s really not a logical scenario. Putting Clemson in the Southeast Division with Florida State and Georgia Tech makes sense considering its history in the ACC.

Commissioner: David Fox, editorial assistant (@DavidFox615)

Before we even chose the draft order, I knew I wanted my conference to have the most engaged fan base. I missed out on all but one SEC program and drafted no teams from Texas, so I’m sure there are a handful of people in those regions who will scoff at a college football conference whose only SEC/Texas representative is Kentucky.

My response: Don’t worry about my conference. I’m not going to have trouble selling tickets. Ohio State, Michigan, Wisconsin, Oregon, Iowa and West Virginia all boast active fanbases. Kentucky’s following in college basketball, especially now that the Wildcats are competing for titles again, is unmatched. The Big Ten has its own television network (I have five teams from that league), BYU has one and the Pac-12 (I have five teams from this one) is starting one with many of the same pieces I have in my own conference.

Sure, my league might struggle for wins and credibility against conferences with strong footholds in the Southeast, Texas and California, but it won’t struggle for intrigue.

I want fans in my conference to be able to drive to road games. I want rival fans to bump into each other in sports bars and airports. I think I’ve achieved that within my two divisions, but especially in my Eastern division, which I'm calling the Lakes Division:

Lakes Division Mountains Division
Iowa Arizona
Kentucky Boise State
Michigan BYU
Minnesota Oregon
Ohio State San Diego State
Pittsburgh Stanford
West Virginia Utah
Wisconsin Washington

For scheduling purposes, I’m going to pair teams with a rival/traveling partner:
• Michigan-Ohio State
• Oregon-Washington
• Pittsburgh-West Virginia
• Minnesota-Wisconsin
• BYU-Utah
• Boise State-Stanford
• Arizona-San Diego State
• Iowa-Kentucky (yes, I realize Iowa and Kentucky aren’t rivals and aren’t particularly close, but this is what the process of elimination left me.)

In football, my league will have nine conference games, seven within the division with the “rivalry game” on Thanksgiving weekend. Each team will play a cross country home-and-home game with the other division with its traveling partner. For example, Ohio State/Michigan will play home-and-home games with Oregon/Washington and then flip home and road games the following year.

My format is going to create some competitive balance issues with teams playing five football road games in some years and West teams having to play at Kentucky when another might play at Ohio State, but my coaches are just going to have to live with it. This is also going to cause long droughts between interdivision matchups. That’s part of the cost of such a large conference, but hopefully that will give my conference championship game a little more cachet.

My division winners will meet in a conference championship game the first week of December. Given the structure of my league, it can’t be anywhere else but the Rose Bowl.

In basketball, my league will be similar to the Big East, but hopefully with a little more balance in conference schedules. I’m not going to use divisions for conference standings, but each team will play its seven football division opponents home and away and play four games (two home, two away) against two of the rivalry/travel pairings. For example, West Virginia and Pitt would each play BYU/Utah and Arizona/San Diego State from the West. My conference tournament would follow the Big East template with double byes for the top four teams and single byes for the Nos. 5-8.

The power of the basketball side of the league will be in the East, especially now, but over time, the West should be more competitive. I need Arizona to return to form, but I also need programs like Washington, Oregon, Stanford and Utah to be more consistent.

<p> College football conference realignment draft: The final word</p>
Post date: Friday, June 29, 2012 - 02:06
All taxonomy terms: News
Path: /news/andy-katzs-big-slip-during-nba-draft

Bulging disc is not an easy phrase to say, especially on live television. Unfortunately for ESPN's Andy Katz, he had a bit of a slip up while trying to discuss why former Ohio State forward/center Jared Sullinger could fall in the draft. Sullinger did slip, but was selected with the No. 21 overall pick by Boston.



However, Katz wasn't the first ESPN personality to slip up while trying to discuss bulging disc injuries. Sportscenter anchor Steve Levy fell victim to this phrase in the 1990s, and as you can tell by the video, it's not easy for former ESPN anchor Keith Olbermann to keep it together.


<p> Andy Katz has a big slip up during the NBA Draft.</p>
Post date: Thursday, June 28, 2012 - 22:01
Path: /nascar/pennell%E2%80%99s-picks-fantasy-nascar-trends-kentucky

Over the past three weeks the NASCAR Sprint Cup Series has run on new surfaces twice at Pocono and Michigan. While Kentucky Speedway is not a new surface, Saturday night's Quaker State 400 is only the second Cup Series race on the 1.5-mile tri-oval. So while teams will have a slightly better idea of what to expect with the notes built from last year’s event, Kentucky Speedway still presents some unknowns.

One team that was a cut above the rest last year was Kyle Busch and his Dave Rogers-led No. 18 team for Joe Gibbs Racing. After scoring a victory in the Camping World Truck Series at Kentucky, Busch dominated the inaugural Cup event, leading 125 of the 267 laps en route to the win.

Yet, entering this weekend's race, Busch has been forced to swallow a string of poor finishes over the past month. After his Richmond win in April, Busch was able to score three-straight finishes of fourth or better. However, since the Coca-Cola 600 on Memorial Day weekend, the No. 18 team has two DNFs, three finishes of 29th or worse with a best finish of 17th, which came last weekend in Sonoma. Busch commented on his poor luck earlier in the week through Twitter, saying he even bit through his tongue while eating lunch. Sometimes when guys have a string of bad luck, it's hard to kick.

Given his performance at Kentucky over the years in various series (and especially in last year's race), I expect Busch to knock the monkey from his back and get back to his contending ways.

If Busch wants to record his second-straight Sprint Cup Series victory at the track, he will have to beat his Joe Gibbs Racing teammate Joey Logano. Many expected the driver of the No. 20 Toyota to be a top contender in last year's race, given his previous success on the 1.5-mile track in the Nationwide Series. However, a 14th-place finish was a lackluster showing for the driver that won three consecutive Nationwide races in Sparta from 2008-10.

This year, however, Logano has a renewed confidence with a race win while the rumor mill churns around him. The performance of the No. 20 team has improved nearly each and every week. Despite a wreck in Michigan, Logano and his Jason Ratcliff-led team have three top 10s and one victory in the last four events.

Heading into the weekend, Logano will not be entered in the Nationwide Series event, allowing him to focus primarily on Saturday night's main event. Sitting 15th in the Sprint Cup standings, another solid run (or a second win) would certainly make the Chase a distinct possibility for the 22-year-old driver.

Five Favorites: Kyle Busch, Joey Logano, Brad Keselowski, Jimmie Johnson, Matt Kenseth

When the 2012 season got underway in Daytona, few would have imagined the quiet season last year's title runner-up Carl Edwards is having.

Despite missing out on his first Cup Series title thanks to a tie-breaker with Tony Stewart, Edwards and the No. 99 team have been lackluster at best through the first 16 races in 2012. Sitting just outside the top 10 in points in 11th, Edwards has not had a top-5 finish since Fontana in mid-March.

While he finished fifth in last year's inaugural event, Edwards has victories at Kentucky in both the Camping World Truck and Nationwide series. Looking to make it three-for-three, crew chief Bob Osborne is bringing a chassis that finished ninth at Charlotte and eighth at Texas earlier this year.

Could the news of Matt Kenseth's departure at the end of season give Edwards and the No. 99 team a boost of confidence (and resources) to drive through the summer months? Perhaps we shall see Saturday night in Kentucky.

Much like Logano, Stewart-Haas Racing's Ryan Newman is sitting outside the top 10 in points with one win and hoping for a spot in the Chase by the time the series rolls into Richmond in September. The driver of the No. 39 Chevrolet was fourth in last year's inaugural race after losing a lap and working with crew chief Tony Gibson to use pit strategy to get to the front.

Newman will need a solid showing Saturday if he wants to continue being a part of the Chase discussion, though. After scoring his only win of the season — in dramatic fashion — at Martinsville in April, Newman has failed to score another top-10 finish. In fact, the team's best showing came at Pocono, where they finished 12th on the repaved surface.

“We need to be a little bit better,” Newman admitted. “I think we’ll get things turned around. We’re still in a championship-contending position. We still have great opportunities with another win, and we still have plenty of time to move up in the points and be in the top 10. We just have to do a little bit better of a job.”

Will this be the weekend that Newman and his SHR team turn things around? A solid showing in last year's event seems to point to another good run, but the teams’ struggles over the last few months may be too large to overcome.

Five Undervalued Picks: Carl Edwards, Ryan Newman, Denny Hamlin, Kasey Kahne, Tony Stewart

<p> Athlon Sports contributor Jay Pennell looks at favorites and darkhorses for Saturday's Quaker State 400 NASCAR Sprint Cup race at Kentucky Speedway.</p>
Post date: Thursday, June 28, 2012 - 14:43
All taxonomy terms: Fantasy Baseball, MLB, Fantasy
Path: /mlb/fantasy-baseball-weekend-rundown-june-28

Stay tuned each week to Athlon Sports for a 2012 Fantasy Baseball Weekend Waiver Wire every Monday and a Weekend Rundown every Thursday.

Welcome Back
Two left-handed hitting National League middle infielders – Stephen Drew and Chase Utley – made their long-awaited season debuts on Wednesday. For Drew, it was his first game since last July when he suffered a severe ankle fracture on a play at home plate. The Diamondbacks’ shortstop went 1-for-4 in his first major league game in nearly a year.

Utley, who has missed significant time the past three seasons due to chronic knee problems, made an even bigger splash in his 2012 debut as he hit a home run in his first at-bat. Utley finished the night against the Pirates 3-for-5, and more importantly, made it through nine innings at second base unscathed.

Either of these guys is worth adding to your roster, if available, especially if you are still looking for a viable replacement for the injured Troy Tulowitzki. Chances are Drew, who is owned in 24 percent of Yahoo! leagues, is more readily available on the waiver wire than Utley (74 percent), but anyone expecting to get the 2005-09 version of Utley is only setting themselves up for disappointment.

From 2005-09 Utley was one of baseball’s top offensive players as the Phillies’ second-sacker averaged 29 home runs, 101 RBI, 111 runs scored and 15 stolen bases a season. The past two seasons, however, Utley has averaged only 109 games played and combined has hit 27 home runs and driven in 109. At 33 and with his knee issues, it is clear Utley’s best days are behind him.

Drew has never put up the overall offensive numbers that Utley once did, but the Arizona shortstop has been a reliable producer for the past five seasons. Last season he was on pace for a .263-10-70 campaign with 82 runs and 39 doubles prior to his horrific injury.

The other caveat with either is this, because they are coming back from significant injuries and have missed a lot of time, neither are expected to be everyday players right away.

If Not Them Then…
If you are still in the market for some middle infield help and neither Drew nor Utley are available or appeal to you, here are some possible options. Minnesota's Trevor Plouffe has been one of the biggest surprises in baseball this season, but that’s what happens when you post a .330-10-19 line over the past 30 days.

The only middle infielder with more home runs that Plouffe during that same period is Robinson Cano. Plouffe is owned in 70 percent of Yahoo! leagues, but if he keeps hitting like this, that number will only continue to go up.

Aaron Hill is another second baseman with some pop as he hit 26 home runs for Toronto in 2010. He also hit just .205 that season as batting average has been one of the knocks on him throughout his career. So far in 2012, Hill has managed a .297 average with 10 home runs and 35 RBI, to go along with six stolen bases with the Diamondbacks. He’s owned in 64 percent of Yahoo! leagues.

Neil Walker may finally be turning things around. Big things were expected from the Pirates’ second-sacker after he followed up a promising 2010 rookie campaign with a respectable .273-12-83 line in 2011. He struggled in May, producing a .238-2-11 line, but has rebounded nicely in June with a .280-2-14 line to go along with 17 runs scored (he had 9 in all of May) and five stolen bases. He’s owned in less than half of Yahoo! leagues.

DL Watch and Other Injury News

*Clay Buchholz is out indefinitely after landing on the DL due to a case of esophagitis that caused gastrointestinal bleeding and resulted in a five-day hospital stay for the Boston pitcher. The right-hander was scratched from his scheduled start on Sunday due to illness and ended up in the ICU because of the bleeding. He was placed on the DL on Sunday and it’s not known how long he will be out as he is scheduled to undergo further testing to determine the cause of his problem and the extent of the damage. Aaron Cook pitched well in Buchholz’s place on Sunday, giving up just two earned runs in five innings in a win over the Braves. However, the veteran right-hander might not get another start with Josh Beckett scheduled to come off of the DL later this week.

*Matt Capps, Minnesota’s closer, went on the DL on Monday after a MRI revealed inflammation in his right shoulder. Capps pitched an inning on Saturday, but felt some discomfort on Sunday, resulting in the MRI and subsequent DL stint. In the meantime, the Twins are going with a closer by committee approach, using a combination of left-hander Glen Perkins and right-hander Jared Burton to finish games.

*Andre Ethier left Wednesday’s game with a left oblique injury. He will undergo an MRI, but a trip to the DL is highly likely. Ethier, who is second in the NL in RBI with 55, could join teammate Matt Kemp (hamstring) on the DL, putting the Dodgers’ two biggest bats on the shelf.

*Mets closer Frank Francisco was put on the DL on Sunday with a left oblique strain. Bobby Parnell will handle the closing duties while Francisco is sidelined.

*Daniel Hudson left his start on Tuesday in Atlanta early after giving up five runs on seven hits in 1 2/3 innings. Initially it was reported as tightness in his right forearm, but an MRI exam on Wednesday revealed a tear in his ulnar collateral ligament. Arizona placed the right-hander on the DL and his season is more than likely over as Tommy John surgery is a distinct possibility. Hudson (3-2, 7.35 ERA) had struggled all season and had already spent about a month on the DL with a right shoulder impingement. This loss to the Diamondbacks’ starting rotation comes on the heels of left-hander Joe Saunders going on the DL on Saturday with a strained left shoulder. Top pitching prospect Trevor Bauer was called up to take Saunders’ place and he will make his major league debut tonight in Atlanta, while Josh Collmenter will replace Hudson in the Diamondbacks’ starting rotation for the time being.

*Texas put Colby Lewis on the 15-day DL with tendinitis in his right forearm. The Rangers’ Opening Day starter, Lewis (6-6, 3.51 ERA) should be ready to return after the All-Star break. He becomes the fourth Texas starter on the DL, joining Derek Holland (sore shoulder), Neftali Feliz (sprained elbow ligament) and Alexi Ogando (strained groin). Roy Oswalt recently joined the Rangers’ starting rotation and the team called up left-hander Martin Perez, its top pitching prospect, from AAA to take Lewis’ spot on the roster.

*Oakland ace Brandon McCarthy went back on the DL on Sunday with a recurring right shoulder strain. McCarthy spent three weeks on the DL in May before returning on June 2. He was extremely effective upon his return, going 3-0 with a 1.35 ERA in three starts, but he was unable to make his last scheduled start on Sunday, resulting in his latest DL stint. It’s unknown when McCarthy will be back on the mound, as the team no doubt will exercise extreme caution with its best pitcher and given his injury history.

*The New York Yankees placed ace CC Sabathia on the 15-day DL on Wednesday with a strained muscle in his left leg. The left-hander (9-3, 3.45 ERA) is expected to miss only two starts, meaning he should be ready to go right after the All-Star break. Freddy Garcia (1-2, 6.91 ERA) is expected to take Sabathia’s spot in the Yankees’ rotation. To make matters worse, the Yankees will also be without the services of another southpaw starter as Andy Pettitte is out for a minimum of six weeks due to a fractured left fibula. The veteran took a comebacker off of the shin in the fifth inning of Wednesday’s game against the Indians. The 40-year-old Pettitte was 3-3 with a 3.22 ERA in nine starts since joining the Yankees in the middle of May.

— By Mark Ross, published on June 28, 2012

<p> Fantasy Baseball Weekend Rundown: June 28</p>
Post date: Thursday, June 28, 2012 - 12:57
Path: /nascar/matt-kensethjack-roush-split

The divorce of one of NASCAR’s longtime partnerships has raised plenty of eyebrows this week. Matt Kenseth, the current point leader in the Sprint Cup Series, has been driving car owner Jack Roush’s No. 17 Ford full-time for over a dozen years. Only four-time Cup champ Jeff Gordon, driving for Hendrick Motorsports since ’93, has been with a team longer; and only Mark Martin, a future Hall of Famer, gave the Roush organization more victories (35, to Kenseth’s 22). A former Cup Series champion — the only such driver on Ford’s current roster — 2003’s top dog, who captured NASCAR’s Super Bowl, the Daytona 500 in February, has plenty of good years left (at only 40). Talent-wise, there are only a handful of better, more proven, drivers on the circuit.

Too bad that’s not where the real talent needs to be these days. Every charismatic move on-track has fallen flat for Kenseth in the boardroom, losing primary sponsor Crown Royal last year and struggling mightily to replace it in 2012. Patchwork deals for three, six, eight races have failed to provide long-term stability, forcing Roush himself to dip into savings and pay for several races out-of-pocket. So this divorce, like many in sports, isn’t about what happens on the track but off it, a classic case of human nature taking control. Once those bank statements dwindle, insecurity about the future trumps success in the present; at some point, the business side of entertainment has to take charge. We all have that survival instinct inside us, concerns about a paycheck causing desperation in order to salvage, retain or advance a career.

For Roush, putting long-term stability in front of loyalty has always been an easy choice. In 2004, top driver Jeff Burton entered the season without a primary sponsor, a scenario playing out remarkably similar to what we’re seeing now with Kenseth. At the beginning of the year, both sides said they would make it through the season, and then some — but by July, the sobering reality of a lack of sponsorship stepping up full-time had caused both sides to start “cheating” behind the scenes. Before you knew it, Burton left his ride midseason, jumping ship to Richard Childress Racing while being forced out by some young, upstart rookie. You see, Roush hoped that with a fast start (combined with charisma and potential) that replacement could have a better chance of attracting a Fortune 500 company to adorn the No. 99’s hood.

It was a gamble that paid off in spades. Within weeks, Carl Edwards had a multitude of top-10 finishes and a multi-million dollar backer. One year later, he finished the season third in points. His tenure with Roush has included AFLAC once sponsoring his car for the princely sum of $26 million a year. With the move, Roush’s No. 99 went from his biggest expense to his source of greatest excitement; just last season, Edwards and Co. came within one on-track position of a championship.

So here we are, in 2012, and Roush has a young, upstart river with charisma tearing up the Nationwide Series in Ricky Stenhouse Jr. Why wouldn’t he think about rolling the dice a second time?

On the other side of the coin, Kenseth sees how Burton’s career wound up at Richard Childress Racing. There, driving the No. 31, the veteran has four Chase appearances and a handful of wins. But more importantly, Burtin has a seemingly lifetime contract for helping restore RCR to prominence. Burton’s sponsor, Caterpillar, doesn’t care about “young” or “old” and appreciates the type of spokesman Burton can be for the company. When you’re 40, having someone back you until retirement becomes a little more important — and that changes the last career decision you make as an athlete.

Joe Gibbs Racing, if that’s where Kenseth is to wind up, has had a sponsorship relationship with the Home Depot since 1999. With its main rival, Lowe’s, attached to Jimmie Johnson the school of thought is it won’t be headed anywhere anytime soon with the right championship driver behind the wheel. For a driver in Kenseth, a man who pleaded in Victory Lane last year for his former full-time backer to stay on board, the stress relief of knowing the bills are paid takes priority.

As people, we like to see the same loyalty given to friendship, marriage and even your local ice cream shop paid off by the people we admire as athletes. But sports remains the most fragile of careers, where anything from an injury to an insult can fracture relationships to the point of disrepair. For me, the surprise isn’t that Roush and Kenseth are breaking up. It’s that they were able to stay together this long.

by Tom Bowles
Follow Tom on Twitter: @NASCARBowles

<p> Athlon Sports contributor Tom Bowles examines the relationship between Matt Kenseth and Jack Roush and what led to the separation after 13 years together in the NASCAR Sprint Cup Series.</p>
Post date: Thursday, June 28, 2012 - 12:19
All taxonomy terms: NFL
Path: /nfl/ranking-nfls-best-back-quarterbacks

Having a quality, dependable back-up quarterback is a must for any NFL team. Last year was a perfect example as Chicago, Houston and Oakland each lost their starters at key junctures of the season, while a back-up took over the reins in Denver and led the Broncos to the second round of the playoffs. 

Ranking them can be just as difficult as finding a good one. There are many different ways to look at the back-up. First, raw upside and talent. Names like Tannehill, Locker and Kaepernick have starting potential but are inexperienced. Second, consistent and dependable veteran leadership. This generally comes behind an established star as simply a back-up plan for an injury-prone vet — e.g., Tony Romo, Jay Cutler or Matt Hasselbeck. Finally, the change of pace player who can bring a totally different game plan to an offense — aka Tim Tebow.

Those with the best combination of the three are truly the best clipboard holders in the NFL:

1. Jake Locker, Tennessee (Games Started: 0, Games Played: 5)
The first-round pick’s natural ability won’t keep him on the bench too long. He is extremely talented and will be ready to take over for Matt Hasselbeck in short order — whether the veteran struggles or not. He has a big arm, is a pure competitor and natural leader with above average athletic ability. The big knock has always been accuracy with Locker (53.9 percent passer at Washington), but the flashes of talent he showed against the Falcons last fall has Titans fans excited about the future. There are not too many better options to learn from than the consummate professional Hasselbeck.

2. T.J. Yates, Houston (GS: 5, GP: 6)
The North Carolina product showed in just a handful of games that he likely has what it takes to one day start in the NFL. While Yates is never likely to become a star, he did post a tidy 80.7 QB rating by completing 61.2 percent of his passes and going 2-3 as the starter in place of an injured Matt Schaub. Additionally, he completed 55.0 percent of his passes against the Bengals in the Texans' first-ever playoff win without tossing an interception. How many names on this list won a playoff game as a rookie starter?

3. Shaun Hill, Detroit (GS: 26, GP: 32)
While Hill has no long-term upside like a Locker or Yates, the Maryland product has six years of NFL experience on his resume. This, of course, includes an effective 10-game run in place of Matthew Stafford in 2010. He threw for 244.2 yards per game with 16 TD and 12 INT. He is 13-13 all-time as an NFL starter for bad 49ers and Lions teams. The 6-foot-5, 210-pounder is as safe and steady a back-up as there is in the NFL today.

4. Jason Campbell, Chicago (GS: 70, GP: 71)
Few players have as much upside and starting experience on this list as Campbell. He was a first round pick and led an unbeaten Auburn team back in 2004. Yet, he has dealt with new coordinator after new coordinator for much of his career. He has a career TD:INT ratio of 74:50 and is 31-39 as a starter for putrid NFL teams in Washington and Oakland. He will never live up to his draft status, but at age 30, all Campbell needs is a chance and some stability.

5. Kyle Orton, Dallas (GS: 69, GP: 71)
As only a rookie, Orton led the Bears to a 10-5 record before not playing a game on the 2006 Super Bowl team. He then got another chance to start in 2008, where he went 9-6. He finished with an admirable 21-12 record as the Bears' signal caller. He then played three years in Denver and had better numbers across the board as a Bronco than anywhere else. Yet, he lost games at a much higher rate, going 12-21 in an Orange Crush uniform. He is 35-34 all-time and has a career passer rating of 79.4. Dallas could do much worse than the 29-year old Neck Beard.

6. Chad Henne, Jacksonville (GS: 31, GP: 36)
The strong-armed former Dolphin has as much upside as any name on this list. He showed marked improvement from year one as the starter in 2009 (2,878 yards, 12 TD, 60.8 percent) to his second year under center (3,301 yards, 15 TD, 61.4 percent). And, in fact, was passing at his highest career rating (79.0) last year through four games when a non-throwing shoulder separation effectively ended his Dolphins career. But he is only 26 years old, has a huge arm and could easily take over for Blaine Gabbert should the second-year player struggle early on.

7. Tim Tebow, NY Jets (GS: 14, GP: 23)
Tebow’s value to a football team lies much more in his leadership and work ethic than ever throwing a football. He is a consummate professional who will be as prepared as he possibly can be for anything his coach asks him to do. However, his ability to accurately complete passes down the field against NFL defenses on a regular basis is highly questionable. You simply cannot complete 46.5 percent of passes and keep the starting job. He is a great change of pace player and is a tremendous member of any locker room. His value may end there however.

8. John Skelton, Arizona (GS: 11, GP: 13)
Stepping in for Kevin Kolb a year ago, the 24-year-old passer went 5-2 as the starter. The Fordham grad has a huge frame (6-5, 244) and averaged nearly 240 yards per game as the starter last year. He needs to work on being more efficient and protecting the football, but at his age and skillset, Skelton still has plenty of potential.

9. Vince Young, Buffalo (GS: 50, GP: 61)
Young has never been committed to being a professional athlete. He has loads of ability and has proven to be a winner, as his 31-19 starting record would indicate. And it is virtually impossible to get images of the greatest college football player I’ve ever seen out of my mind. Yet, there are plenty of other not-so-flattering off the field images too. Until Young can prove he is willing to dedicate himself to his craft, he will be relegated to the bench.

10. Ryan Mallett, New England (GP: 0, GS: 0)
Just because he has never taken a snap in the NFL doesn’t mean that the mammoth quarterback won’t be a big success. He has a massive frame, an arm that compares to Matthew Stafford’s and is learning under the most successful QB-Head Coach duo of this generation. He may be behind Brian Hoyer on the 2012 depth chart, but he could easily find himself as trade bait and/or the heir apparent in a couple of years.

11. Rex Grossman, Washington
Not an NFL starter but showed flashes with 3,151 yards and 16 TDs last year.

12. David Garrard, Miami
Has started 76 games and compiled more than 16,000 yards passing while accounting for 106 total TDs.

13. Brian Hoyer, New England
Is technically No. 2 behind Brady and has never started. Dependable but limited upside.

14. Colin Kaepernick, San Francisco
Extremely productive athlete in college but attempted only five passes in his rookie year.

15. Ryan Tannehill, Miami
Loads of athleticism and upside but is a rookie who was a wide receiver two years ago.

16. Chris Redman, Atlanta
Only has 12 career starts but has been in Falcons system for four full seasons.

17. Drew Stanton, Indianapolis
Has some upside and he should get some looks with a rookie starter ahead of him.

18. Trent Edwards, Philadelphia
Has started 33 games at the NFL level (14-19). No replacement for experience.

19. Derek Anderson, Carolina
Has 43 career starts but is inaccurate and turns the ball over too much to start.

20. Colt McCoy, Cleveland
Has starting experience and is a hard-working and mature member of the team.

21. Byron Leftwich, Pittsburgh
22. Bruce Gradkowski, Cincinnati
23. Chase Daniel, New Orleans
24. Brock Osweiler, Denver
25. Tyrod Taylor, Baltimore
26. Tavaris Jackson, Seattle
27. Joe Webb, Minnesota
28. Charlie Whitehurst, San Diego
29. Graham Harrell, Green Bay
30. Kellen Clemens, St. Louis
31. Matt Leinart, Oakland
32. Brady Quinn, Kansas City

- By Braden Gall


Related: Ranking the NFL's 2012 Starting Quarterbacks

<p> Ranking The NFL's Best Back-Up Quarterbacks</p>
Post date: Thursday, June 28, 2012 - 10:00
Path: /college-football/big-ten-football-2012-all-conference-team

The 2012 college football season is just around the corner, and Athlon continues its countdown to kickoff with a look at our first, second and third All-Big Ten teams for this season.

Athlon's 2012 All-Big Ten Team
First-Team Offense
QB Denard Robinson, Michigan
RB Montee Ball, Wisconsin
RB Rex Burkhead, Nebraska
WR Jared Abbrederis, Wisconsin
WR Keenan Davis, Iowa
TE Jake Stoneburner, Ohio State
C Travis Frederick, Wisconsin
OL Taylor Lewan, Michigan
OL Spencer Long, Nebraska
OL Chris McDonald, Michigan State
OL Ricky Wagner, Wisconsin

First-Team Defense
DL William Gholston, Michigan State
DL Johnathan Hankins, Ohio State
DL Kawann Short, Purdue
DL John Simon, Ohio State
LB Chris Borland, Wisconsin
LB Gerald Hodges, Penn State
LB Mike Taylor, Wisconsin
CB Johnny Adams, Michigan State
CB Ricardo Allen, Purdue
S C.J. Barnett, Ohio State
S Isaiah Lewis, Michigan State
First-Team Specialists 
K Brett Maher, Nebraska
P Brett Maher, Nebraska
KR Raheem Mostert, Purdue
PR Jared Abbrederis, Wisconsin
The Breakdown of Athlon's 2012 All-Big Ten Team
  First Second Third Overall
Illinois 0 3 2 5
Indiana 0 0 3 3
Iowa 1 2 1 4
Michigan 2 2 5 9
Michigan State 4 4 2 10
Minnesota 0 0 2 2
Nebraska 4 3 5 12
Northwestern 0 2 3 5
Ohio State 4 6 1 11
Penn State 1 2 0 3
Purdue 3 1 0 4
Wisconsin 7 1 2 10
Second-Team Offense
QB Braxton Miller, Ohio State
RB Le'Veon Bell, Michigan State
RB Fitzgerald Toussaint, Michigan
WR Kenny Bell, Nebraska
WR Roy Roundtree, Michigan
TE Jacob Pedersen, Wisconsin
C James Ferentz, Iowa
OL Dan France, Michigan State
OL Jack Mewhort, Ohio State
OL Brian Mulroe, Northwestern
OL Andrew Norwell, Ohio State

Second-Team Defense
DL Michael Buchanan, Illinois
DL Jordan Hill, Penn State
DL Akeem Spence, Illinois
DL Baker Steinkuhler, Nebraska
LB Denicos Allen, Michigan State
LB Max Bullough, Michigan State
LB Jonathan Brown, Illinois
CB Micah Hyde, Iowa
CB Bradley Roby, Ohio State
S Christian Bryant, Ohio State
S Ibraheim Campbell, Northwestern

Second-Team Specialists
K Drew Basil, Ohio State
P Cody Webster, Purdue
KR Ameer Abdullah, Nebraska
PR Justin Brown, Penn State

Third-Team Offense
QB Taylor Martinez, Nebraska
RB Stephen Houston, Indiana
RB James White, Wisconsin
WR Demetrius Fields, Northwestern
WR Kofi Hughes, Indiana
TE Kyler Reed, Nebraska
C Graham Pocic, Illinois
OL Ed Olson, Minnesota
OL Patrick Omameh, Michigan
OL Bernard Taylor, Indiana
OL Patrick Ward, Northwestern

Third-Team Defense
DL David Gilbert, Wisconsin
DL Cameron Meredith, Nebraska
DL Craig Roh, Michigan
DL Marcus Rush, Michigan State
LB Will Compton, Nebraska
LB Kenny Demens, Michigan
LB James Morris, Iowa
CB Blake Countess, Michigan
CB Terry Hawthorne, Illinois
S Jordan Kovacs, Michigan
S Daimion Stafford, Nebraska
Third-Team Specialists
K Dan Conroy, Michigan State
P Ben Buchanan, Ohio State
KR Troy Stoudermire, Minnesota
PR Venric Mark, Northwestern


Athlon's 2012 Big Ten Team Previews

Related Content: Athlon's 2012 Big Ten Predictions

Leaders Legends
Indiana Iowa
Illinois Michigan
Ohio State Michigan State
Penn State Minnesota
Purdue Nebraska
Wisconsin Northwestern

<p> Big Ten Football 2012 All-Conference Team</p>
Post date: Thursday, June 28, 2012 - 06:00
Path: /college-football/west-virginia-football-introducing-mountaineers-big-12

West Virginia is packing its bags and moving from the Big East to the Big 12. The Mountaineers will fit in well in their new conference, especially with a high-powered offense led by quarterback Geno Smith.

Not familiar with West Virginia? Here's an introduction on the Mountaineers from a West Virginia point of view:

Consider this a primer on West Virginia athletics for Big 12 fans. A Mountain State 101, if you will. A “Mountaineers for Dummies” guide.

It should prove helpful — because WVU and its fans are different breeds.

Perhaps we should stop right there. If you ever feel inclined to call residents here in-breds or hillbillies, or crack jokes about teeth, outhouses or the state flower being a satellite dish, here’s some advice: Save it. Those here will yawn. We’ve heard it all. The jokes are as old as our hills. “Deliverance” was filmed in Georgia; we have wireless, dental plans and, yes, indoor plumbing.

Just don’t misunderstand. West Virginia isn’t North Carolina. It isn’t Ohio. It is different. Coal is king, yet WVU athletics are the passion, the maypole for the small state’s residents. When times are rough, residents rally around their Mountaineers. And times are plenty rough economically.

You might ask about reports of fans allowing their exuberance to get out of hand. You might ask if those reports are true. The answer: damn straight. There indeed have been couches burned in celebration. A team bus or two might have been shaken. And, yes, Bobby Bowden was hung in effigy and chased out as coach, pushed to Florida State. (How did that work out?)

Yet here’s the catch: Bowden still returns regularly. He loves the place. See, West Virginia is a place where people say hello on the street. Residents are known for their friendliness and hard work — as well as their sports passion.

One can trace much of that back to a man named Jack Fleming. He was the “Voice of the Mountaineers,” but a man you might remember as the radio voice of the Pittsburgh Steelers. Still doesn’t ring a bell? This will: He made the call on the “Immaculate Reception.”

Fleming lived in Pittsburgh but made the hour trek each Saturday to call WVU games. He hated rival Pitt and allowed that to seep into his broadcasts. He hooked listeners with his passion and loyalty to the Mountaineers. On game day, Fleming’s voice echoed throughout the hills. One could walk the neighborhood and not miss a play. Every house was tuned in.

Yet there was something missing: success. In the late 1950s, WVU experienced tremendous hoops success via a skinny native kid named Jerry West. You might’ve heard of him. Dallied around with the NBA and Lakers. Did some modeling, I believe, to become the NBA’s logo.

However, after West became a real-life “Beverly Hillbilly,” Mountaineer fortunes steadily dropped. There was a serious lull. Even Bowden couldn’t pump life into the football program.

And then something happened. Former governor and current state senator Jay Rockefeller (yes, of those Rockefellers) helped WVU build a new stadium. John Denver was flown in to christen it by singing “Country Roads.” (If you live here, by the way, you hear that song as much as the national anthem.)

Also, a Bo Schembechler assistant named Don Nehlen was hired to take over the football program. And WVU sports haven’t been the same since.

At first, there was slow improvement. A team that went 2–9 in 1978 moved to 6–6 in Nehlen’s first season in 1980. The next season, the Mountaineers went 9–3 and defeated Florida, 26–6, in the Peach Bowl. It caught the attention of all WVU fans.

But the real birth of Mountaineer sports in the modern era took place smack in the middle of Big 12 country. In Norman, Okla., to be specific. While WVU was impressive in defeating Florida, the Gators weren’t of the Urban Meyer ilk. The Oklahoma Sooners were.

Set up as an opening day patsy in 1982 for OU coach Barry Switzer and new recruit Marcus Dupree, Nehlen and quarterback Jeff Hostetler stunned all with a 41–27 victory.

For the most part, the good times have rolled ever since. There were down years, but things started to crackle. A dazzling quarterback named Major Harris hit Morgantown and turned the place upside down, leading WVU to its first unbeaten, untied record and a 1988 national championship appearance in the Fiesta Bowl against Notre Dame. (WVU lost after Harris was injured early in the game.)

When Nehlen’s magic began to disappear, Rich Rodriguez returned to his home state and picked up the wand. Like Nehlen, he found a dazzling quarterback in Pat White. RichRod unearthed a keeper in tailback Steve Slaton. At the end of the 2005 season, WVU stunned  heavily favored Georgia in the Sugar Bowl. All of a sudden, West Virginia was the darling of a downtrodden Big East. The Mountaineers defeated Georgia Tech the next year in the Gator Bowl.

Then came the highest of the highs and lowest of the lows for WVU football. In 2007, the Mountaineers were on track for another national championship appearance. All they had to do was defeat a sub-par Pittsburgh team at home in the regular-season finale to secure a BCS title game berth.

But on a dark night in Morgantown, the Panthers stunned WVU, 13–9. It crushed the team. It crushed the fans. It is still regarded as one of the biggest chokes, if not the biggest, in college football history. It was a body blow that sent the program to the canvas. Rodriguez announced shortly afterward that he was leaving for Michigan.

A folksy assistant, however, took over in the aftermath. Bill Stewart became a home-state hero by leading the beleaguered team to a 48–28 win over Oklahoma in the Fiesta Bowl.

Stewart was given the head coaching job. He led the team to three 9–4 records. And was summarily fired. It wasn’t enough. Stewart’s down-home act, which lifted the program in the Rodriguez aftermath, got stale.

Now, all is different. Oliver Luck, a slick businessman, ex-WVU quarterback and father of wunderkind Andrew Luck, is the athletic director. He hired the new breed of coach, Dana Holgorsen, who installed his “Air Raid” offense.

And the new breed is mixing well with WVU’s different breed of fans. When the Mountaineers scored 70 points on Clemson in last season’s Orange Bowl, Holgorsen became one of The Men.

He is not, however, The Man. There is another: basketball coach Bob Huggins.

While many nationally see Huggins as a grump, West Virginians love the guy. After John Beilein lifted WVU, much like Rodriguez, and then left for Michigan, much like Rodriguez, Huggins saved the day by leaving Kansas State to return to his alma mater.

While Beilein took the Mountaineers to the Sweet Sixteen and Elite Eight, Huggins took them to the Final Four. Today, WVU’s athletic fortunes are as healthy as ever.

How do WVU fans feel about leaving the Big East for the Big 12? Well, thrilled in football and skeptical in basketball.

There is also an unfamiliar feel. Those here haven’t followed Baylor football or Iowa State basketball. It’s, well, weird. No Backyard Brawl? No visits from Syracuse?

But West Virginians will follow their Mountaineers with fervor. That’s a promise. They’ll turn their attention west instead of north and south.

And, yes, if need be, re-position those satellite dishes.

Related Big 12 Content

Athlon's 2012 Big 12 Predicitons
Athlon's 2012 All-Big 12 Team
Athlon's Top 25 for 2012: No. 12 West Virginia

Is Geno Smith the Big 12's Best Quarterback?

<p> Introducing West Virginia to the Big 12</p>
Post date: Thursday, June 28, 2012 - 05:59
Path: /college-football/college-football-conference-realignment-draft-part-4

As we enter the final day of our conference realignment draft, all four commissioners elected to use the entire allotment of picks to build 16-team superconferences.

Through the first 12 rounds, each league established its identity. Some are focused on particular regions, some are focused on being well-rounded among football, basketball and baseball programs.

Previous rounds: Rounds 1-4 | Rounds 5-8 | Rounds 9-12

On the final day, some key programs remain in play -- teams like Boise State, TCU and Utah, which have all gone undefeated in non-Big Six conferences in recent years, in addition to basketball powers Connecticut, Indiana and Syracuse.

A refresher on our ground rules of this four-team, 16-round draft: Each commissioner drafts the entire package -- the program’s history, current performance and personnel and long-term potential. Each commissioner will take on an entire athletic program, from football to men’s basketball to lacrosse and gymnastics, the program’s academic reputation, and any NCAA baggage.

After selecting Purdue with the final pick of the 12th round, Light begins the 13th round on the turn.


49. Mitch Light (@AthlonMitch): Indiana
Conference so far: Arkansas, Duke, Georgia, Illinois, LSU, Miami, Michigan State, NC State, Oklahoma, Purdue, Texas, Virginia Tech
The Hoosiers’ struggles in football continue — IU went 1–11 in 2011 and was the only team in a BCS conference that failed to beat an FBS team — but Tom Crean has the basketball program in position to compete for a national championship in the 2012-13. With Duke and NC State along with Purdue and Indiana, my league now has two outstanding basketball rivalries to hang its hat on. With my pick of Purdue to wrap up the 12th round, I add a rival for the Boilermakers.

50. Braden Gall (@BradenGall): TCU
Conference so far: Alabama, Auburn, Louisville, LSU, Maryland, Missouri, Nebraska, North Carolina, Notre Dame, Ole Miss, Tennessee, USF
I had a distinct and orchestrated plan in place for my final four picks and it involved the state of Texas. TCU was easily the best current football program left on the board. With plans coming to upgrade facilities and a coach who appears entrenched, the Horned Frogs felt like an easy pick. Getting into the Dallas-Fort Worth metroplex was crucial for my Lone Star strategy.

51. Steven Lassan (@AthlonSteven): Syracuse
Conference so far: Cal, Clemson, Florida, Florida State, Georgia Tech, Kansas, Oklahoma State, South Carolina, Texas A&M, UCLA, USC, Virginia
The Orange have won only 43 games over the last 10 years, so it’s important to my football product for this university to return to its 1990s performance. While the football product has slipped, Syracuse is solid in basketball and helps to get my conference into New York.

52. David Fox (@DavidFox615): Utah
Conference so far: Arizona, BYU, Iowa, Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio State, Oregon, Pittsburgh, Stanford, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin
Pairing Utah with rival BYU was a priority here. I was concerned someone would snatch Utah before I could circle back with this pick, so I’m counting myself lucky. The Utes have two undefeated seasons since 2004 under two coaches, plus five 10-win seasons in the last nine years. Given the early results, the Utes also look like they’re going to remain competitive on the Pac-12 level.


53. Fox: Boise State
I know there aren’t many TVs in Boise or in Idaho. In addition, Boise State offers little outside of football. But what a football program Boise State brings to the table. The Broncos are consistently interesting and consistently good, and at least for the first few years of my conference, fans nationwide will be curious if the Broncos can compete at this level on a weekly basis. For the sake of my conference, I hope Boise State is up to it.

54. Lassan: Colorado
I regretted passing on Utah, but the Buffaloes aren’t a bad consolation prize. Adding Colorado should help my conference branch into the Denver television market. Although recent success has eluded the Buffaloes, they did claim a national title in 1990 and four Big 12 North titles in 2000s.

55. Gall: Texas Tech
The biggest, most powerful athletic department still left in the state of Texas is certainly an outlier when it comes to geography. But Mike Leach proved you can win big at Tech and getting my second Lone Star State-based program to package with TCU was clutch. With the right coaching, this school has loads of upside and growth still to come.

56. Light: Arizona State
Arizona State has tremendous potential in football and is one of the top baseball programs in the nation — ASU has been to the College World Series 22 times — but as the only school west of Texas it’s a bit of a geographic misfit in my league. The Sun Devils’ closest “rivals” in the league are Oklahoma (971 miles) and Texas (1,004 miles). The basketball program has only made the NCAA Tournament four times since 1981. That’s not good.


57. Light: Vanderbilt
The Commodores are showing signs of life in football — they have played in a bowl game twice in the past four years and are recruiting better than ever under James Franklin — but this pick was made to strengthen the academic profile of my league and bolster baseball and basketball. The baseball program has been to the NCAA Tournament seven straight seasons and has won two SEC titles since 2007, while the basketball program is coming off of a stretch of four NCAA Tournament appearances in five seasons.

58. Gall: Mississippi State
I completed by Deep South division by adding The Egg Bowl to my Iron Bowl. Keeping another one of the South’s great rivalries under my control felt like tremendous value at this stage of the draft. Getting a seventh SEC team into my league — one with rich tradition on the basketball court and baseball diamond as well as the gridiron — made this an easy choice. I now completely control the state of Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana and Tennessee.

59. Lassan: Connecticut
It’s going to be tough for the Huskies to compete in football, but this addition was more about giving Syracuse a rival and adding some basketball power to my conference.

60. Fox: Minnesota
I’m down to one team in the East and one team in the West to complete two eight-team divisions. I strongly considered Cincinnati for my last East team. From a purely athletic standpoint, Cincinnati has been a stronger football and basketball program than Minnesota in recent years, but Ohio State dominates this state anyway. Minnesota has a new football stadium and gives me rivalry games with Wisconsin, Michigan and Iowa. And what’s college football without trophy games?


61. Fox: San Diego State
I was counting on Arizona State being available to complete my Western division with a rival for Arizona. Why Light reached West for the Sun Devils in his conference is beyond me. Oregon State and Washington State are still available, but I’d like to have an opponent where Arizona fans can drive to road games. San Diego State is one of college sports’ biggest underachievers, a stigma the Aztecs are just now escaping in football and basketball. If San Diego State finally starts to deliver on its potential, my league will have a second solid California program. If not, well, at least it’s a good November road trip for all my fans in Minnesota, Iowa and Wisconsin.

62. Lassan: Baylor
I already had one team in Texas, but it was hard to pass on an athletic department that has produced a Heisman Trophy winner and a women’s basketball champion in 2012. The men’s basketball program is improving, and the football team is coming off back-to-back bowl appearances for the first time since 1991-92.

63. Gall: Houston
With Tech and TCU already in the fold, and LSU just next door, adding the Houston market to the league was the deciding factor between equivalent programs SMU and Houston. The Cougars have a lot of work to do in order to become a financial windfall, but the potential is painfully obvious. This pick gives me three teams in Texas, allowing my league to play upwards of 15 games per year in the most talent-rich state in the nation.

64. Light: Kansas State
K-State was one of the current BCS conference programs still on the board for the final pick in the draft. The Cats aren’t elite in any one area but are solid across the board. The football program won 10 games last season and appears to have reestablished itself as a force in the Big 12 in Bill Snyder’s second stint in Manhattan. K-State basketball, which is making the transition from Frank Martin to Bruce Weber, has made the NCAA Tournament four times in the past five season — after not making it once from 1997-2007.

Coming tomorrow: Our commissioners determine the format of their conferences -- assigning divisions, staging conference championship games and semifinals, and determining scheduling philosophies.

National Conglomerate of Athlon Authorities Conference Alignment Draft Recap

Rd Mitch Light Braden Gall Steven Lassan David Fox
1 >> Texas Alabama Florida Ohio State
2 << Oklahoma Notre Dame USC Michigan
3 >> Georgia LSU Florida State Oregon
4 << Penn State Nebraska UCLA Washington
5 >> Michigan State North Carolina Texas A&M Wisconsin
6 << Miami Tennessee Oklahoma State West Virginia
7 >> Virginia Tech Auburn Clemson Iowa
8 << Illinois Missouri South Carolina Pittsburgh
9 >> Arkansas Louisville Cal Kentucky
10 << NC State USF Georgia Tech Stanford
11 >> Duke Ole Miss Kansas BYU
12 >> Purdue Maryland Virginia Arizona
13 << Indiana TCU Syracuse Utah
14 >> Arizona State Texas Tech Colorado Boise State
15 << Vanderbilt Mississippi State Connecticut Minnesota
16 >> Kansas State Houston Baylor San Diego State

Related College Football Content

Athlon's 2012 Conference Predictions
Athlon's Top 25 for 2012

<p> College football conference realignment draft: Part 4</p>
Post date: Thursday, June 28, 2012 - 05:50
All taxonomy terms: College Football
Path: /college-football/college-football-playoff-did-the-bcs-get-it-wrong

College football fans finally have what they — we — have all been craving for decades. The playoff era of the greatest sport on the planet is upon us.

And fans are already concerned with selection committees, bowl sites, future playoff expansion and TV revenue. But don’t miss the forest for the trees. Take a second to sit back and truly embrace the fact that we now have a playoff system in college football. And while an eight-team playoff could certainly be coming down the pike soon, the four-team bracket is the only way a champion should be crowned.

Yet, the BCS, for all of its criticism, was a dramatic improvement on the previous system. And in reality, few times did the BCS get it wrong.

Where Did The BCS Get It Wrong?

Ideally, a selection committee will be allowed to use the eyeball test to overcome some obvious discrepancies. In the 14-year history of the BCS, only three times did the BCS get it wrong. Although Michigan fans in 2006 and Oklahoma State/Stanford fans last year have plenty to scream about, most would agree that the BCS got the correct match-up in the national championship game in those two seasons. So the BCS went 11-3 in 14 years. Again, it wasn’t perfect, but it was better than the three split national titles and controversial unbeaten 1994 Penn State team that college football fans experienced the eight years prior to the advent of the Bowl Championship Series.

2004 Auburn Tigers (13-0)
This team was loaded with NFL talent and absolutely deserved a chance to compete for the national title. War Eagle beat five top-15 teams, including four in the top 10 en route to an unbeaten season. We don’t know that Auburn would have beaten Oklahoma or USC, but I know how I would have picked those games. I got the Tigers over the Sooners and the Trojans over the Tigers. The right match-up, in hindsight, would have been USC-Auburn. The 55-19 drubbing of the Sooners has since been vacated by the Men of Troy, only furthering the idea that Auburn should have been involved somehow. A playoff would have fixed this entire quagmire.

2003 USC Trojans (12-1)
Oklahoma played only three ranked opponents in 2003 but defeated all comers in impressive fashion. But a 35-7 destruction at the hands of Kansas State in the Big 12 Championship Game makes it hard to think that the No. 1 team in both polls, USC, shouldn’t have gotten a shot at the eventual one-loss champion LSU Tigers. Who knows which one-loss team was the best? The result was the last split national title in the college game. A playoff would have obviously fixed this situation as well.

1998 Ohio State Buckeyes (11-1)
The Buckeyes were the No. 1 team in the nation for the first nine weeks of the year before a turnover-filled four-point loss to Michigan State derailed the OSU national title train. This team was as talented as Tennessee and was clearly a better football team than Florida State — who faced the Vols in the first-ever BCS title game. This Buckeyes team pounded five ranked opponents and finished fourth in the final BCS standings. An Ohio State-Tennessee match-up would have been a much more fitting way to end the season instead of Marcus Outzen flailing against a stacked Vols defense.

Certainly, the 2001 championship game that featured a Nebraska team that allowed 62 points to No. 3 Colorado in the season-ending loss gets plenty of scrutiny. However, who deserved to be in that game over Nebraska? Tennessee should have played in the game but was beaten in the SEC championship game by LSU. Oregon, Colorado and Florida could make cases, albeit very weak ones, for a bid. The truth of the matter was that the Miami Hurricanes were going to slaughter anyone it played. It might have been the greatest football team ever assembled. And frankly, no team had a strong case to be on the same field as Miami that night in Pasadena.

Did the BCS really squeeze out the Mid-Majors?

The little guy has been screaming about being left out of the national title picture for decades and many pointed fingers at the BCS system. Thirteen teams have gone undefeated in the BCS era and didn’t play for the BCS National Championship game. So the ill-suited BCS completely failed on 13 different occasions to acknowledge the tremendous accomplishments of a few, right? Not so. Of those 13 undefeated teams, only four landed in the top four of the BCS standings at the year’s end. I’ve documented the 2004 Auburn Tigers, but only Cincinnati (2009), TCU (2009) and TCU again (2010) would have landed in a "Football Four" playoff system.

Both the 2009 teams went on to lose in BCS bowl games, and in the Bearcats case, were demolished. That leaves TCU in 2010, who finished unbeaten after defeating a powerful Wisconsin Badgers team in the Rose Bowl, and Auburn in 2004 who had a rightful claim to some piece of the national championship. So twice, not 13 times, did the BCS “screw a team out of a chance at a title.” Strangely enough, Boise State has gone undefeated four times since 2004 and the highest it has ever finished in the BCS standings was sixth in 2009.

So the argument that the new playoff format will allow for the little guy to compete for a title is technically true — but only twice would a "mid-major" have landed in the top four. That means 54 of the potential 56 playoff teams during the BCS era would have been the “big boys” of college football.

Teams that finished the regular season unbeaten and did not play for the national title:

  • Tulane, 1998 (Final BCS Standing: 10th)
  • Marshall, 1999 (12th)
  • Auburn, 2004 (3rd)
  • Utah, 2004 (6th)
  • Boise State, 2004 (9th)
  • Boise State, 2006 (8th)
  • Hawaii, 2007 (10th)
  • Utah, 2008 (6th)
  • Boise State, 2008 (9th)
  • Cincinnati, 2009 (3rd)
  • TCU, 2009 (4th)
  • Boise State, 2009 (6th)
  • TCU, 2010 (3rd)

The Separation of Haves and Have-Nots

Initially, the BCS only released a 15-team ranking (until 2003). In the 14-year history of the series, only nine different mid-major programs finished in the Top 15 of the BCS. Even worse, only five mid-major programs have ever finished in the Top 10 of the final BCS standings: Boise State, TCU, Utah, Tulane and Hawaii. The other four top-15 finishes were Marshall (12th, 1999), Miami-Ohio (11th, 2003), BYU (14th, 2009) and Nevada (15th, 2010). Only twice, TCU in '09 and '10, did a mid-major finish in the top four. Clearly, the BCS wasn’t looking out for the little guy.

Meanwhile, 14 current “BCS conference” teams, not counting Temple, have failed to finish in the top 15 of the BCS. The SEC and Big East lead the way with four programs each who have never sniffed an elite final ranking. Some names are obvious — Vanderbilt, Indiana, Duke — and some are downright startling — North Carolina, Pitt, NC State. Interestingly, Iowa State has never been ranked at any point of any season in the BCS and the Pac-12 is the only league to have gotten every member into the Top 15 at season's end.

BCS Conference Teams That Have Never Finished in the BCS Top 15:

SEC (4): Kentucky, Ole Miss, Mississippi State, Vanderbilt
Big East (4): UConn, Pitt, Rutgers, South Florida
ACC (3): Duke, North Carolina, NC State
Big Ten (2): Indiana, Northwestern
Big 12 (1): Iowa State
Pac-12: None

Of the possible 210 slots available in the top 15 of the BCS’ history, 192 of them were filled by power conference teams while only 18 times has a mid-major team landed in that final top 15. In fact, the NC States and Pitts of the world are the type of programs that will be the real winners in the new playoff scheme. The bottom halves of the power leagues are the schools who now have an open door to the national title party. Not the New Mexico or Southern Miss.

The BCS certainly wasn’t perfect but it was a vast improvement on the previous system, and frankly, got it right most of the time. That said, a playoff system is a vast improvement on the BCS and won’t be allowed to get it wrong. Yes, the fifth team will complain about being left out. No, the selection committee isn’t perfect. Yes, it could expand to eight teams in the future due to greedy TV executives. No, the bowls shouldn’t be shoe-horned into the playoff structure. Yes, the little guy has a marginally better shot at a title. No, it won’t win one.

But let’s not forget the key to this whole BCS mess: Four teams are now playing for the national championship on the field.

And the most important piece of the college football machine is the biggest winner of all.

The fans.

- by Braden Gall


Related: Key Questions For College Football's New Playoff
Related: What Should the Selection Committee Look Like?
Related: Athlon's Conference Realignment Draft

<p> College Football Playoff: Did The BCS Really Get It Wrong</p>
Post date: Thursday, June 28, 2012 - 05:30
All taxonomy terms: College Football, News
Path: /college-football/college-football-playoff-whats-biggest-unanswered-question

The BCS is no more, and college football will have a playoff beginning with the 2014 season. Although the new format and structure was officially announced on Tuesday, many questions remain for college football fans across the nation.

What's the Biggest Unanswered Question With College Football's New Playoff Format?

David Fox (@DavidFox615)
I could start with questions of the composition of the selection committee or how the revenues are distributed and if any of those revenues will go to a player stipend. But all those questions are a little inside baseball at this point. I want to know what a college football season is going to look like once the playoff is in place. Oregon (ranked fifth) essentially was punished in the rankings last season for losing to LSU to open the season, compared to Stanford (ranked fourth, who lost to Ducks by 23 points at home). Will the new system encourage more marquee non-conference games or discourage them? If the system discourages them, what happens to perennial games like USC-Notre Dame or Florida-Florida State and so on? As for the remaining teams in the non-Big Six -- the Mountain West, MAC, Conference USA and Sun Belt -- will those teams be able to schedule enough quality non-conference opponents to make a run at a playoff should they go undefeated? Or will they be further designed to being second-class citizens?

Braden Gall (@BradenGall)
It won't be the most important aspect for fans — that will be the selection committee, timing, the bowl sites or host cities — but the flow of revenue is easily the largest, most influential decision yet to be made. The 2011 BCS television contract was worth $174 million and the new TV deal could easily triple that figure in two years when this playoff party gets started in 2014. So over the course of the 12-year lifespan of the playoff contract, the TV agreement could be worth upwards of $6 billion dollars. How is that money divided? Who does the dividing? And what criteria will be used to determine where the money is shipped? So while fans will be consumed with the selection process, where games will be played or future expansion, the only thing the decision makers are concerned with is dollars and cents. And it is this flow of cash that will shape the future landscape of college football more than anything else.

Steven Lassan (@AthlonSteven)
The makeup of the selection committee is my biggest concern. Several options have been thrown out for the committee but none particularly stand out. Are we really sure former head coaches are knowledgeable about current teams? When you throw conference commissioners, university presidents and athletic directors onto the committee, bias and objectivity will be a major source of concern for the fans. The selection committee is going to be heavily scrutinized and rightfully so. The people choosing college football’s top four teams need to be knowledgeable about each team, as well as watching several games each week. I’m not sure former head coaches or athletic directors fit that qualification. Although a selection committee will probably work out fine, I think concerns will always exist over this aspect of the new playoff format. 

Mitch Light (@AthlonMitch)
For me, it's the make-up of the selection committee. I would rather see some sort of formula that combines a poll (or polls) and a computer ranking. But that isn't happening, so it's time to focus on the committee: Who will be on it and how will they go about selecting the teams? This will be a much more difficult task than selecting the 68 teams for the NCAA Tournament in basketball. The sample size is far greater in hoops; you have 30-plus games to evaluate teams. In football, there are 12 or 13 games, and maybe only four or five of those games were against top-25 caliber teams. It will be far more difficult — and the ramifications much greater — to differentiate between teams No. 4 and No. 5 in football than it is to sort out teams No. 68 and No. 69 in basketball. I hope the selection committee is up to the task.

Mark Ross
To me the biggest question that remains is the one that will produce the most debate and scrutiny come December - choosing the four playoff teams. Because in the end, regardless of how the money ends up being distributed amongst the conferences and how the selection committee ends up looking, what matters most, to conferences, schools and fans alike, is which four teams get that shot at a national title?

For all its detractors and naysayers, the BCS system did its job. It identified the top two teams in all of college football using a formula made up of different pieces of information and measurements. One can find fault with the different components in the formula itself, but in the end, the BCS did what it was created to do. Now instead of two teams, the playoff selection committee will be tasked with identifying the top four teams, while also defending their reasoning for not picking the other 120. No pressure, right?

Related College Football Content

College Football Ditches Playoff for BCS
What Should the Composition of a Selection Committee Be?

Athlon's College Football Rankings for 2012
College Football's Top 25 Heisman Contenders for 2012

Athlon's 2012 College Football Predictions

<p> College Football Playoff: What's the Biggest Unanswered Question?</p>
Post date: Thursday, June 28, 2012 - 04:45
All taxonomy terms: College Football, News
Path: /news/did-college-football-get-it-right-four-team-playoff

College football will finally settle the championship on the field. No more BCS and computer polls deciding No. 1 vs. No. 2. Although the playoff is expected to be an improvement, is this the right move for college football?

Did College Football Get it Right With a Four-Team Playoff?

David Fox (@DavidFox615)
In the barest sense, college football got it right by establishing a four-team playoff. It’s a system that presumably keeps the regular season relevant, enhancing it in some cases, while giving two more deserving teams a shot at a national title. However, I’m concerned about the unintended consequences -- how the selection committee selects its four teams could impact the regular season. Conference realignment already has devastated rivalries and led to awkward geographic partnerships. I worry the playoff may push those trends further. And the process of subjectively selecting four teams to play in bowl games -- the same outdated and sometimes corrupt ventures we've had for decades -- is hardly the ideal solution. A four-team playoff gives twice as many teams a chance to play for a title, but the system doesn’t look that much different to me if it proceeds in the same way the BCS did 14 years ago.

Braden Gall (@BradenGall)
I will go to my grave fighting for an NFL-style, six-team playoff that features two bye weeks, two total extra games, home sites for every game with the exception of the rotating National Championship game. But alas, the powers that be in college football haven't asked me yet. So, for my money, the next best thing was a four-team playoff with a seeded bracket that features the four best teams in the nation. This has been our wish as college football junkies for more than a quarter of a century and now we have it. Money, selection process, TV contracts, bowl games, timing and site locations, while very important, are all secondary to the simple fact that we have a playoff in college football. The rest of the process will fall into place and will likely create dissension, but don't miss the forest through the trees. The second your eyes fall upon a Football Four bracket with Michigan-Alabama on one side and Texas-USC on the other, you will instantly understand who the biggest winner was in all of this: The Fans.

Steven Lassan (@AthlonSteven)
I have to admit, I never thought the BCS was that bad of a system. Sure, it had negatives, but what system doesn’t? There’s no perfect format for the college football postseason and controversy will exist every year. However, I think a four-team playoff is a good move. The college football regular season is easily the best in sports and there’s no reason to change that. I have concerns about the selection committee, but the real issues would start if college football expanded to an 8- or 16-team playoff. When you start expanding the field, that’s when the regular season will be devalued – and hopefully college football’s postseason format never gets bigger than four teams. 

Mitch Light (@AthlonMitch)
Well, I would have preferred to see an eight-team playoff, and I am not in favor of a selection committee, so it’s hard for me to say that college football “got it right.” But I believe that this is a big step in the right direction and will add a tremendous amount of excitement to what is already a great sports. If I had to give college football a grade, I’d go with a solid B+.

Mark Ross
Truthfully, I don't know if we'll know this answer until after the initial four playoff teams are chosen. I am very curious to see how the playoff selection committee is put together and what criteria they will use in determining the four-team field. That said, I do think replacing the BCS with a playoff is certainly a step in the right direction.

I am a big proponent of settling things on the field rather than through computer-generated formulas. It remains to be seen how much of a role "human error" will potentially play with the selection committee, but in the end four teams, and not two, will get a shot at winning the national title, and that's a good thing. Personally, I would like to see the field expanded to eight to allow more teams a chance, but four is a good start.

Related College Football Content

College Football Ditches Playoff for BCS
What Should the Composition of a Selection Committee Be?

Athlon's College Football Rankings for 2012
College Football's Top 25 Heisman Contenders for 2012

Athlon's 2012 College Football Predictions

<p> Did College Football Get it Right With a Four-Team Playoff?</p>
Post date: Thursday, June 28, 2012 - 04:43
Path: /college-football/sun-belt-football-2012-all-conference-team

The 2012 college football season is just around the corner, and Athlon continues its countdown to kickoff with a look at our first and second All-Sun Belt teams for this season.

Athlon's 2012 All-Sun Belt Team

First-Team Offense

QB Ryan Aplin, Arkansas State

RB Alonzo Harris, Louisiana-Lafayette

RB Kedrick Rhodes, FIU

WR Josh Jarboe, Arkansas State

WR Javone Lawson, Louisiana-Lafayette

TE Jack Doyle, Western Kentucky

C Sean Conway, Western Kentucky

OL Leonardo Bates, Louisiana-Lafayette

OL Caylin Hauptmann, FIU

OL Zack McKnight, Arkansas State

OL Adam Smith, Western Kentucky

First-Team Defense

DL Isame Faciane, FIU

DL Omar McLendon, MTSU

DL Quanterus Smith, Western Kentucky

DL Tourek Williams, FIU

LB Winston Fraser, FIU

LB Nathan Herrold, Arkansas State

LB Andrew Jackson, Western Kentucky

CB Jose Cheeseborough, FIU

CB Melvin White, Louisiana-Lafayette

S Jonathan Cyprien, FIU

S Brynden Trawick, Troy

First-Team Specialists

K Jack Griffin, FIU

P Will Atterberry, North Texas

KR John Evans, Western Kentucky

PR Darryl Surgent, Louisiana-Lafayette

The Breakdown of Athlon's 2012 All-Sun Belt Team

  First Second Overall
Arkansas State 4 2 6
FAU 0 1 1
FIU 8 3 11
Louisiana-Lafayette 5 5 10
Louisiana-Monroe 0 4 4
MTSU 1 1 2
North Texas 1 5 6
South Alabama 0 0 0
Troy 1 4 5
Western Kentucky 6 1 7

Second-Team Offense

QB Blaine Gautier, Louisiana-Lafayette

RB Benny Cunningham, MTSU

RB Jyruss Edwards, Louisiana-Monroe

WR Brett Leonard, Louisiana-Monroe

WR Eric Thomas, Troy

TE Keavon Milton, Louisiana-Monroe

C Aaron Fortenberry, North Texas

OL Rupert Bryan, FIU

OL Jonathan Gill, Louisiana-Monroe

OL Cyril Lemon, North Texas

OL Jaron Odom, Louisiana-Lafayette

Second-Team Defense

DL Ryan Carrethers, Arkansas State

DL Tony Davis, Troy

DL Gregory Hickman, FIU

DL  Brandon McCoy, North Texas

LB Jordan Hunt, FIU

LB Randell Johnson, FAU

LB Zachary Orr, North Texas

CB Jemarlous Moten, Louisiana-Lafayette

CB Bryan Willis, Troy

S Jonathan Dowling, Western Kentucky

S Don Jones, Arkansas State

Second-Team Specialists

K Brett Baer, Louisiana-Lafayette

P Brett Baer, Louisiana-Lafayette

KR Brelan Chancellor, North Texas

PR Justin Albert, Troy

Athlon's 2012 Sun Belt Team Previews

Related Content: Athlon's 2012 Sun Belt Predictions

Arkansas State MTSU
FAU North Texas
FIU South Alabama
Louisiana-Lafayette Troy
Louisiana-Monroe Western Kentucky

<p> 2012 Sun Belt All-Conference Team</p>
Post date: Thursday, June 28, 2012 - 04:32
Path: /nascar/nascar-horsepower-rankings-4

1. Jimmie Johnson  It’s a toss up at the top, but J.J. has more wins and, as evidenced by his top-5 run at Sonoma, is a more well-rounded driver than Earnhardt or Kenseth.

2. Dale Earnhardt Jr.   That said, championships are not won on road courses, so Junior’s 23rd-place showing — to be fair, he ran around 15th most of the day — will not hurt his title quest.

3. Matt Kenseth   Can a “lame duck” driver win a championship? We know a crew chief can (see: Grubb, Darian). We’ll find out, as Kenseth leads the point standings but has an eye on new digs in 2013.

4. Tony Stewart   Stewart has always been a somewhat streaky NASCAR driver, and his third-, second- and second-place runs in the last three weeks find him on a hot one.

5. Greg Biffle   Impressive seventh at Sonoma (for Biffle) finds him back in second in the point standings, just 11 points behind his Roush Fenway teammate. Kentucky should be good to him.

6. Clint Bowyer   Prior to his win in Sonoma, Bowyer had clicked off three consecutive finishes of seventh or better. What was surprising was that a dirt tracker from Kansas took his first win at MWR on a road course.

7. Denny Hamlin   Hamlin won earlier this season in Kansas and, let’s be honest, what’s the difference between that cookie cutter and the one in Kentucky?

8. Brad Keselowski  Last season’s Watkins Glen winner only registered a 12th at Sonoma, and was never really in contention. He needs to get out of the 12th- to 18th-place hole he’s been in of late.

9. Martin Truex Jr.   Truex led 15 laps and ran in the top 5 for a large part of the day until contact with Joey Logano on the final lap knocked him from sixth to 22nd. That’s tough to take, folks.

10. Kasey Kahne   Pit strategy wasn’t in Kahne’s favor on Sunday. In fact, he slipped from a certain top-10 run to 22nd only to rebound late and salvage a respectable 14th-place showing.

<p> Jimmie Johnson finds his way back atop Athlon Sports' weekly NASCAR Horsepower Rankings, besting Dale Earnhardt Jr. and Matt Kenseth.</p>
Post date: Wednesday, June 27, 2012 - 17:43
Path: /nascar/backseat-drivers-fan-council-18

The announcement that Matt Kenseth will leave Roush Fenway Racing after this season has been the talk of NASCAR. Members of the Backseat Drivers Fan Council didn’t hold back on what they thought about the move on if it was good or bad for Roush and how this might impact Kenseth’s title hopes.

The Backseat Drivers Fan Council also weighed in on Sunday’s race at Sonoma, who between 11th and 20th in the points will make the Chase and more. Here’s what they had to say.


68.3 percent called it a bad move for Roush trading a former champ for a Cup rookie
31.7 percent called it a good move, trading a 40-year-old for a 24-year-old in a nod to future

What Fan Council members said:
• Although I hate to see Matt Kenseth go, there are only so many cars that Jack Roush can put out there and if Ricky did not end up in a Cup car, then he may end up there with another team and that would be a bigger loss.

• Stenhouse will be a star. Cheaper for Roush as well. Kenseth can get on with Gibbs (if the rumors are true). WIN WIN for everyone.

• Ricky will never be as good as Matt. Matt is a great driver, has a wonderful sense of humor and he's humble. Put up against Matt, Ricky will never measure up.

• Bad move for no other reason than a continuation of the Roush mentality of abandoning career drivers for others. Nothing but money. Re: Mark Martin, Jeff Burton, Kurt Busch. Jack Roush is a businessman that is dedicated to money, not his employees. His counter ego would appear to be Coach Gibbs.

• For the short run, I'd rather have Kenseth, but in the long run, Stenhouse will be an elite Cup driver.

• JACK HAS LOST HIS MIND. WOW what a mistake — just like some of the others Jack has made.

• As a die-hard Matt fan, I think it's a bad move and I blame it on the RFR sales department. Even in a down economy, it shouldn't be this hard to find sponsors for a championship-caliber driver on the track and a class individual off the track. Considering the same RFR sales department couldn't even sign any sponsors for Trevor Bayne after he won the 500 last year, I guess I shouldn't be surprised at their inability to do so (now).

• I can't believe the coldness with which a champion who is leading the points is dumped for a cheap, child driver. This is the same attitude toward employees that is killing this country. I'm sure Fenway had a big say in this.

• The financial environment is unwittingly making NASCAR more and more like major league sports with free agency. There is no loyalty any more, not that the teams wouldn't like to stay together, but because the finances don't work out. For whatever reason, Roush Fenway doesn't seem to be able to sell sponsorships well or at least at a level that permits them to field teams for their talent. Matt's ride this year was barely filled, and undoubtedly they all knew that sponsor commitments (or lack of) would make it impossible for RFR to pay him what his asking price was for next year.

• Kenseth is in position to win the championship and you're going to do that to him? That is beyond ridiculous. Stenhouse is a good driver with a bright future and there is no reason why they don't just bring back the fourth car since he apparently can get sponsorship and Trevor Bayne can't, which I don't understand, either.

• Stupid, stupid move on Roush's part! Wish Kenserh the best though ... as long as he doesn't go to Toyota!

• Nothing against Ricky, but if they cannot get Matt sponsorship for a full season who do they think will come aboard for a rookie with less talent?

• It's the only move Roush could make. Kenseth is going to command a very large new contract and Roush hasn't had a full slate of sponsors for him for a couple of years now. Kenseth can go to Gibbs and Home Depot and cash in and Roush can start his rebuild with a great young driver. I think Stenhouse is going to be a little like Tony Stewart: better in a more powerful Cup car than the Nationwide car. Those dirt guys love all that extra power. I think Kenseth will be a great asset at Gibbs as a calming influence, plus I think he might just have a title or two left in him. It’s a win-win situation for everyone.

Matt Kenseth noted on Twitter that he doesn't believe that announcing he'll leave the team after this season will hurt his title chances, noting crew chief Darian Gurbb knew he would not return with Tony Stewart last year and they won a title together. Fan Council members were asked what they thought.

51.6 percent said Kenseth’s titles chances will be unaffected
39.1 percent said Kenseth hurt his title chances
9.3 percent said Kenseth helped his title hopes since there will be a greater drive to win the title in the final year with the team

What Fan Council members said:
• I believe as long as his team believes in him and themselves he has just as much chance as anyone else to win the title.

• I think he could still go on to win it. But, just like contract talks, etc., at mid-season even though they "say” it doesn't affect them they always admit when it is over that it did. It has to. A NASCAR driver ain't no fry cook at McDonalds. This is big money and big impact at a high level.

• 1. A crew chief is not as public of a position as a driver. 2. Grubb's move wasn’t made public until AFTER the championship. 3. Grubb and Stewart didn't decide he was leaving until Charlotte IN THE CHASE. You can't tell me Biffle won't get better equipment knowing he'll be there next year. This may help Carl make the Chase now.

• Matt has always said over the years that he doesn't let front office issues (contracts, sponsorships, etc.) affect his racing, so I would like to think that would continue. Being the top-tier driver he is, it's not like he needs to worry about not being able to find a ride next year (even if a JGR agreement isn't already in place).

• Matt has gained the points lead during the most difficult point in his negotiations with Roush and his future team. The announcement has been made and Matt is liberated, free from care and any consternation, free to focus on his goal of winning the Sprint Cup.

• Grubb wasn't announced. It was all internal and there were no "extra" spotlights on Grubb/Stewart. ALL eyes will focus on ANY shift in performance with Kenseth the rest of the year. Stick a fork in his title hopes.

• Can anyone say “Quack, Quack!” This might not affect Matt right now, but once he announces where he is headed and then Roush starts uninviting him to team meetings, that is when you will see the effect.

• Solidarity amongst the entire team is necessary to win a title. What Tony Stewart did last year was super-human. I do not feel Matt Kenseth is of the same caliber of driver as Tony. I feel the driver leaving a team is more troubling than a crew chief.

• I still think the championship is going to come down to Johnson, Stewart and Kenseth this year. It might be tempting for Roush to play favorites and give Biffle some extra attention, but I don't think he will — Matt has been too important to Jack's company for him to do that. I think they will end this relationship in a classy way.

• I think what Matt said is totally right. Grubb knew he was out five races early and still ended up with the title, so it doesn't really matter. It may be a slight issue, especially since Matt's directly involved with where he goes, but not enough to distract him that bad. He is a championship driver still, even as a lame duck.


47.3 percent called it Good
32.4 percent called it Fair
10.8 percent called it Great
9.5 percent called it Poor

What Fan Council members said:
• My husband and I went to the race. I felt there was a lot of single-file racing, not a lot of action and got kind of bored during the race. Still liked being there, though.

• Typical road racing, very little passing or real racing. The only saving grace was Kurt Busch's valiant challenge near the end. Otherwise, completely sans drama or excitement.

• I had no problem with the race. Some will say it’s boring, but at least there was driving ability and strategy involved in this win.

• The race itself was good — if you don't count my driver's "genius crew chief" finding another way to lose a race. The TNT coverage, however, was an unmitigated disaster, capped by showing the GWC restart through the BACK of the grandstand. Seriously. They did that. I don't know how ANYONE would have found Sunday's telecast compelling.

• I thought the duel at the end between Kurt Busch and Clint Bowyer was awesome. The rest of the race was so-so.

• I graded this race as fair just because for some reason there was no excitement. I'm not one that needs cautions or wrecks to have excitement but this race was just plain boring. But then again they all can’t be awesome all the time.

• I was there, and it was AWESOME!!

• Not crazy about road courses, but TNT's coverage just about ruined it all for me. Not quite sure about all that went on as they really showed none of what was happening. The lack of cautions and the bad luck my driver faced is making me rate this race as only “fair.”

• Had really high hopes for this race, but it turned out to be a real snoozer

• This was by far the WORST telecast of the season. Stuff was happening left and right and TNT completely ignored it or did a poor job presenting it. Even later on they would not go back to (or mention) important race happenings. Shame on you TNT. Thank goodness for Twitter so I actually knew what was going on with my driver and with the race.

<p> The Backseat Drivers Fan Council wieghs in on Matt Kenseth's departure from Roush Fenway Racing, his team's title hopes, the road race at Sonoma and on which winless driver in 2012 will break through first.</p>
Post date: Wednesday, June 27, 2012 - 16:43
All taxonomy terms: Big 12, News
Path: /news/west-virginia-ready-its-move-big-12

July 1 is moving day in college football. West Virginia and TCU will officially become members of the Big 12, while Missouri and Texas A&M make the jump to join the SEC. Those moves were the biggest in the latest round of realignment and the July 1 date can’t get here fast enough for some teams.

West Virginia took the Big East to court to leave the conference a year early, and the Mountaineers will be expected to be a Big 12 title contender in 2012.

Work is already underway for West Virginia’s switch in conferences, as the turf at Milan Puskar Stadium is getting a bit of a makeover.

Here’s a look at the new Big 12 logo on West Virginia’s field - Tweeted by @GoldAndBlueZone

Here's a closeup of the new Big 12 logo on the field - Tweeted by @WVIllustrated

And here's a wider shot of the field - Tweeted by @Mountaineers22

Related West Virginia Content

West Virginia Mountaineers 2012 Team Preview
Big 12 Football All-Conference Team for 2012

2012 Big 12 Predictions

<p> West Virginia Is Ready For Its Move to the Big 12</p>
Post date: Wednesday, June 27, 2012 - 16:15
All taxonomy terms: Golf, News
Path: /golf/less-more

I think all golf fans would agree by proclamation that the PGA Tour season is too long. So what is the Tour doing to address this problem? That's right. They're lengthening the season. Just what the public was clamoring for — an endless Tour! It's like hell, with wedges and hybrids.

Starting in 2013, the Fall Series events will count toward the 2014 FedExCup points standings, meaning that the 2014 golf season will run from early October 2013 until late September 2014, with the 2015 season presumably starting the week following the 2014 Tour Championship.

Not to put too fine a point on it, but that is insane.

While technically, this change adds no new events to the schedule, it's a futile attempt to add meaning and drama where none exist. It further saturates a sports marketplace that barely had room for golf to begin with.

You thought baseball season was long; wait until you enjoy 365 days of FedExCup drama. This thing will make the siege of Leningrad seem brief and to the point.

Golf needs contraction, not expansion. With that in mind, I propose the following schedule, one that would enhance the fan experience, boost ratings by winnowing the excess and keep the spotlight where it belongs: on the best events. 

We'll start in March, when spring is approaching and people are actually thinking about golf. We'll end it on Labor Day Weekend, reaching a crescendo just in time to clear the stage for football. 

Here it is: 20 meaningful tournaments, one manageable schedule. 

Hyundai Tournament of Champions—We'll leave Hawaii on the schedule. Spectacular scenery, nice reward for the previous year's winners.

Northern Trust Open—Riviera's historic enough to keep. We'll dump Pebble Beach; the pro-am is just too gimmicky.

Accenture Match Play—Coincinding with March Madness, we keep the Tour's version of bracketology.

Bay Hill—It's Arnold. Enough said.

WGC-Cadillac—Like Riviera, Doral's worth keeping.

The Masters—No comment necessary.

Wells-Fargo—Quail Hollow has earned its stripes.

Byron Nelson—Only to keep Lord Byron's name alive for future generations of players and fans. We'd do the same for Colonial if it had Hogan's name on it.

The Players—We'll let the Tour keep its biggest tournament.

The Memorial—It's Jack; see Arnold above.

U.S. Open—It's a major. We'll put some space around it.

WGC-Bridgestone—The WGC events assemble the best fields. We move this one to June to clear August for the playoffs.

AT&T National—Celebrates the 4th in the nation's capital.

The British Open—Golf's oldest tournament would grow in stature with a shorter schedule.

Canadian Open—We'll throw America's Hat a bone.

PGA Championship—It's a major, so make it the kickoff to the playoffs.

Barclays, Deutsche Bank and BMW—The playoffs take us through the dog days.

The Tour Championship—Finish it on Labor Day, create some tradition, and clear the stage. Football's here.

- by Rob Doster

<p> Less Is More</p>
Post date: Wednesday, June 27, 2012 - 16:07