Does Ron Santo Deserve to be in the Hall of Fame?

Unpublished

Main Header Image
<p> Ron Santo isn't deserving of Hall of Fame status in my mind, but he's ranks well with several players already enshrined.</p>

by Charlie Miller

I guess the Veterans' Committee, which can designate former players for Hall of Fame selection, feels like it needs to elect someone every year. At least that’s the way it seems. Today, the committee announced that Ron Santo, a longtime Chicago Cubs player then broadcaster, has been elected to the Hall of Fame. Santo was a terrific third baseman and clutch hitter. He meant so much to the game and the city of Chicago as a broadcaster after his retirement. But is he a Hall of Famer?

Not in my mind. However, if Phil Rizzuto and Bill Mazeroski have bronze plaques at Cooperstown, then Santo should as well. The problem? With each borderline player elected to the Hall, the membership becomes that much more diluted.

It seems more than fair for a player to be included on the BBWAA ballot for 15 years. If more than 25% of the BBWAA members shun a player for 15 years, you know, maybe he isn’t Hall of Fame caliber.

And the Veterans' Committee members aren’t the only ones to blame. As writers elect pitchers like Bert Blyleven, then Jack Morris and Tommy John become more viable candidates, and Jim Kaat, who just missed election by the committee by two votes, has an even stronger argument.

At some point, perhaps the Hall should acknowledge an official distinction between Ron Santo and Brooks Robinson. Between Bert Blyleven and Tom Seaver. Between Bill Mazeroski and Rogers Hornsby.

Follow Charlie on Twitter @AthlonCharlie.

MLB Teams: 

Home Page Infinite Scroll Left