The Pac-12 is a conference on the rise, and the league was strengthened during this year’s coaching carousel. Washington hired Chris Petersen away from Boise State to replace Steve Sarkisian, who left to take over at USC.
Boise State had success in the years prior to Petersen taking over, but the California native guided the program to new heights, including two BCS bowl victories. Petersen’s final record at Boise State was 92-12.
Sarkisian didn’t inherit much to work with when he arrived in Washington in 2009. The Huskies made a five-game improvement in the win column in his first season and won at least seven games in each of the next four years.
With more resources and an expected top-notch coaching staff at his disposal at USC, Sarkisian is expected to return the Trojans to national championship contention.
Both programs seem to have found a good fit. Is Sarkisian or Petersen the better hire this offseason?
Washington or USC: Which Program Made the Better Coach Hire?
Steven Lassan (@AthlonSteven)
Steve Sarkisian is a good fit at USC, but Washington made the better hire. Boise State’s Chris Petersen is arguably one of the nation’s top 15-20 coaches and guided the Broncos to a 92-12 record. Boise State also went 5-2 in bowl games under his watch and finished six times in the final Associated Press poll from 2006-12. Winning in a BCS league on a week-to-week basis is certainly going to be a bigger challenge than in the Mountain West, and Petersen has to prove he can win outside of Boise State, unlike previous coaches (Dan Hawkins and Dirk Koetter) that left for Pac-12 jobs. However, Petersen is regarded as one of the best X’s and O’s coaches in the nation and will have more resources at his disposal in Washington. Sarkisian will win a lot of games at USC, but I think the Huskies upgraded when they hired Petersen away from Boise State.
I think both schools made solid hires, but I believe Washington hit the proverbial "home run" in luring Petersen away from Boise State. Don't get me wrong, I have no issues whatsoever with USC picking Steve Sarkisian as Lane Kiffin's replacement, but I have been anxious to see what Petersen could do at a "major" program for several years. This is a guy who up until this season had won at least 10 games every season with the Broncos. Included in his eight-year run was five conference titles and two BCS bowl victories. Now Petersen, a California native who played at UC Davis, gets to stay "home" in the Pacific Northwest and apply his winning formula at Washington, a school with significantly more resources and national brand recognition than Boise State, even with the Broncos' recent run of success.
USC is one of the top coaching jobs in college football, but instead of going for the "home run," athletic director Pat Haden decided to tap into the Trojans' most recent glory days by hiring Sarkisian, a former assistant coach under Pete Carroll. This actually put Washington AD Scott Woodward in the tougher position of filling his vacancy, and give him credit for finally saying the right things to convince Petersen to leave Boise. Of the course the biggest question regarding the Huskies' new head man is will the winning follow him from the famed "Smurf Turf" to Seattle? Only time will tell, but Washington fans have no reason to not be excited about the future of their football program.
David Fox (@DavidFox615)
Let’s start by saying both will do well. I’d argue both Washington and USC upgraded their coaching situations. Go ahead and point to the the last two Boise State coaches who flamed out at major jobs, both at current Pac-12 schools. Dirk Koetter took over a program that had stagnated at Arizona State and still had nice seasons. Dan Hawkins took over a mess of a program at Colorado. Petersen, though, has a program ready to return to national prominence. That’s partly due to the facilities upgrades and the work Sarkisian did when he took over a program in disarray. Skeptics wonder if Petersen will be able to recruit at the level Washington needs to in order to beat Oregon and Stanford. I have enough faith in Petersen as an administrator to augment his abilities with his staff. After all, this is a guy who needed to replace Justin Wilcox, Bryan Harsin, Brent Pease and others over the years. He’ll do fine at Washington.
Braden Gall (@BradenGall)
Can I wait until I see the entire make up of coaching staffs to make that decision? On the surface, Chris Petersen feels like the better hire. However, if Steve Sarkisian can lure Justin Wilcox, Tosh Lupoi and Peter Sirmon to join him in Los Angeles, than I would switch my vote. Petersen is more of a proven commodity who has obviously won at a higher level. But he has struggled the last two seasons (relatively speaking) as the Broncos stepped up in competition by joining the Mountain West. And his 2013 campaign was the worst of his head coaching tenure at Boise. Coach Sark knows the USC landscape and understands what the expectation levels will be at Heritage Hall. Both teams made quality hires given their circumstances, but for now, Washington has done something that many have failed to do in luring Petersen away from Boise State. Trojans fans likely think they "under hired" while Huskies believe they actually upgraded.