Skip to main content

Ranking the Repeat Super Bowl Champions

AikmanTroy.jpeg

Seattle can join a rather exclusive club with a win over New England in Super Bowl XLIX. It would mark the ninth time in the Super Bowl era that a team was able to repeat as champion.

Where would the Seahawks rank among past repeat champs? Let’s not get ahead of ourselves, they need to win first; but Super Bowl victories over slam-dunk Hall-of-Fame quarterbacks Peyton Manning and Tom Brady would be a strong start for any argument.

Here’s a look at the eight teams that have managed to repeat and how we rank them. Keep in mind, we are really splitting hairs here.

1. Miami, Super Bowls VII and VII

Regular season record: 26-2

Points in their favor:  This was perhaps the most dominant two-season run in the Super Bowl era. The Super Bowl VII champs remain the only undefeated team since 1929, led the league in offense and defense and can even boast a road playoff win, as some odd scheduling rules at the time sent them to Pittsburgh for the AFC title game.  Even though Miami didn’t go undefeated in 1973, the Dolphins still put together an impressive season, and they were more dominant in the postseason than they had been the year before.

What hurts their case: About the only knock you can come up with for this run would be that Miami’s Super Bowl competition was not as strong as some others on this list. The games were less than memorable, save for kicker Garo Yepremian’s ill-fated attempt at a pass that resulted in Washington’s only points in Super Bowl VII.

 2. Dallas, Super Bowls XXVII and  XVIII

Regular season record: 25-7

Points in their favor:  The Cowboys won the league’s toughest division at the time in both 1992 and ‘93. They also had to get by equally dominant San Francisco in the NFC title game both years, the first time on the road. While the two Super Bowls look like easy wins if you just look at the final scores, Dallas was not rolling over teams just happy to be there. Buffalo was loaded with Hall of Famers, desperate after two previous Super Bowl losses and in fact led in both games. The Cowboys just rolled over them.

What hurts their case: Both Super Bowls got out of hand, so perhaps there is a “clutch” factor missing here that can be found elsewhere on this list. But in terms of overall dominance for two seasons, including facing tough playoff competition, this run is difficult to beat.

3. San Francisco, Super Bowls XXIII and XXIV

Regular season record: 24-8

Points in their favor:  This was the height of the 49ers’ powers, as they were in the league’s top five offensively and defensively in both 1988 and '89. Their 10-6 record in 1988 sent them on the road for the NFC title game, but they routed Chicago, 28-3. The 1989 team was outstanding, going 14-2 and winning its playoff games by a combined score of 71-16. The Super Bowl wins may be the most impressive on this list when you consider they beat the league MVP (Boomer Esiason) in the first and a Hall-of-Famer (John Elway) in the second.

What hurts their case:  It’s impossible to ignore a 10-6 regular season when matching this team up against the undefeated 1972 Dolphins. Some may also be less-than-impressed with a rout of a Denver team losing its third Super Bowl in four years, but those Broncos had given up the league’s fewest points.

4t. Pittsburgh, Super Bowls IX and X

Regular season record: 22-5-1

Scroll to Continue

Recommended Articles

Points in their favor:  We’re copping out a bit by not picking one Steelers’ repeat over the other, but it’s essentially the same cast of characters. The perception is that the Steelers’ first two Super Bowl teams were carried by the defense, and to some extent that is true. But both the 1974 and ‘75 squads were also in the league’s top 10 on offense, as stars such as Franco Harris, Lynn Swann and Terry Bradshaw were just hitting their primes. The 1975 Steelers were the league’s most dominant team all season as Bradshaw finally started every game at quarterback, adding a big-play element to a dominant running game.  It would make the difference in the Super Bowl as Swann caught four passes for 161 yards to earn MVP honors in a 21-17 win over the Cowboys.

What hurts their case:  The 1974 team may have dodged a bullet in that they hosted wild-card Buffalo in the divisional round of the playoffs despite having the AFC’s third-best record due to the league’s odd rotation for playoff matchups at the time. But the road win at Oakland in the AFC title game was impressive enough to make up for that, and the Super Bowl was no contest as the Steelers ran over the Vikings.

4t. Pittsburgh, Super Bowls XIII and XIV

Regular season record: 26-6

Points in their favor:  The 1978-79 Steelers were still dominant defensively (ranking third and second, respectively, in the NFL) but much more explosive offensively than the 1974-75 teams that won the Super Bowl. In fact, in six postseason wins on the way to winning Super Bowls XIII and XIV, Pittsburgh averaged 32 points per game. The Steelers also defeated a defending Super Bowl champ in Super Bowl XIII, one of only two teams on this list to do so.

What hurts their case:  While these may have been more balanced teams than the earlier Pittsburgh Super Bowl champs, the earlier teams faced tougher competition in the postseason. While the Super Bowl win over defending champ Dallas is impressive, it is cancelled out by facing a 9-7 Rams team in Super Bowl XIV.

6. New England, Super Bowls XXXVIII and XXXIX

Regular season record: 28-4

Points in their favor:  New England’s 28-4 regular season record is eclipsed only by the 1972-73 Dolphins when it comes this list. The Patriots also had impressive playoff wins along the way, beating Peyton Manning and the Colts both seasons and going on the road to defeat 15-1 Pittsburgh in 2004. While many others on this list cruised to Super Bowl wins, New England was tested twice and came out on the winning end of two 3-point games.

What hurts their case: Some would argue that two clutch Super Bowl wins could also be called “less-than-dominant.” Needing a last-second field goal to beat upstart Carolina was especially surprising. The Pats were also not loaded with Hall of Fame players like some teams on this list. It’s certainly harder to keep a team together and repeat in the 21st century, so perhaps that is in their favor; but in terms of overall dominance, this is a tough list with which to compete.

7. Denver, Super Bowls XXXII and XXXIII

Regular season record: 26-6

Points in their favor:  The 1997 Broncos represent the only non-division champ on this list. But despite finishing second in the AFC West, they were top-five in offense and defense and had the league’s best point differential. They also defeated defending champ Green Bay in the Super Bowl. The 1998 team featured league MVP Terrell Davis and beat a 14-2 Atlanta team in the Super Bowl.

What hurts their case: We knocked the Niners down a peg for a less-than-dominant regular season, so we have to consider that Denver was a wild card team in 1997.  Also, while the 1998 Falcons were very good, the fact that they upset a 15-1 Vikings juggernaut in the NFC title game leaves us wondering what might have been in Super Bowl XXXIII.

8. Green Bay, Super Bowls I and II

Regular season record: 21-6-1

Points in their favor: The Packers are victims of bad timing here, because their two Super Bowl wins came at the tail end of a run that saw them win five NFL titles in seven seasons.  If the Super Bowl Era had started even one season sooner, odds are we are talking about the only three-peat ever.

What hurts their case: Green Bay’s stars were all aging at this point. In fact, legendary backs Jim Taylor and Paul Hornung moved on after Super Bowl I, while other stars such as Bart Starr, Ray Nitschke, Willie Wood, Forrest Gregg and Jerry Kramer were all on the wrong side of 30. There is no denying the greatness of this dynasty, but the pre-Super Bowl Packers were the stronger and more dominant teams.

-- By John Gworek